Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoHexadecimalslrpnk.netimagemessage-square136linkfedilinkarrow-up11.07Karrow-down124
arrow-up11.04Karrow-down1imageHexadecimalslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square136linkfedilink
minus-squaremacniel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down4·2 years agoits the capital city of China :D you know, where something happend on a specific square in the specific year of 1984.
minus-squaremacniel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·2 years agooh… sorry, you are right. but you will get the same result.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down6·2 years agoYou think DeepSeek won’t talk about one of the largest cities in the world?
minus-squareTempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 years agoWell shit. I thought it was BS too. But damn if it didn’t abort after a little deep thinking on the Olympics.
minus-squareKusimulkku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 years agoYou know, you could’ve just tested it yourself lol
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·2 years agoWhy would I do that when the Internet will correct me? Seems like a really weird line to draw. I guess they got bored of people trying to trick it into talking about Tianamen?
minus-squareKusimulkku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoIt was just funny the way you dismissed the claim without testing it yourself. But it’s almost too silly to be true
minus-squaremacniel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoOh it does… but then it will remove everything and states that it’s out of scope.
minus-square𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 years agoThat would be 4 june 1989, not 9 june 1984 sir ;)
minus-squaremacniel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoMy life is a lie :o Thanks for the correction.
its the capital city of China :D
you know, where something happend on a specific square in the specific year of 1984.
You missed the g.
oh… sorry, you are right.
but you will get the same result.
You think DeepSeek won’t talk about one of the largest cities in the world?
Well shit. I thought it was BS too. But damn if it didn’t abort after a little deep thinking on the Olympics.
You know, you could’ve just tested it yourself lol
Why would I do that when the Internet will correct me?
Seems like a really weird line to draw. I guess they got bored of people trying to trick it into talking about Tianamen?
It was just funny the way you dismissed the claim without testing it yourself. But it’s almost too silly to be true
Oh it does… but then it will remove everything and states that it’s out of scope.
That would be 4 june 1989, not 9 june 1984 sir ;)
My life is a lie :o
Thanks for the correction.