Bro’s protest voting when the Weimar American Republic has Nazis on the ballot and thinks building “grassroots support” for the twentieth year in a row justifies it when the world is about to run out of time anyways
You want Green candidates? Tell them to run as Democrats or make a fucking militia.
Step 1: Flee the country
Step 2: Laugh at all the idiots getting what they deserve
Step 3: Get nuked anyways
Yeah some treason is cool
Like, yes, Trump is a traitor, but the real problem is he did it for the wrong treasons, making him trash.
No, you fools, the divine spirits of the stars are different than ghosts!
While we’re on the topic, I demand they begin to support universal leprechaun farts.
Not me, I didn’t consent to that
That’s a little less than what my primary charged my insurance for an office visit in 2022. Including $200 for a mental health screening that, offense intended to the well known institution that runs the office, was worthless and unnecessary because I’ve already received actual professional help for that and I know what it looks like, thanks.
You’re named Borat bro…
FlyingSquid for President
Of course, one of the things about Lemmy is you can’t appeal a mod action (as far as I know)
JordanLund seems fairly level but once deleted one of my comments for “advocating violence” when I said Nixon and Kissinger should have been hanged for treason. They’re both already dead… And that’s the legal punishment for high treason. Which they did.
Tl;Dr you can’t get in a mod fight because you can’t fight back
Robespierre Did Nothing Wrong
You’ve made an enemy for life!
I mean, they could just give away 90% of a billion dollars, leaving them with a pathetic 100 million dollars.
If only. I went to one of their bishop factories as yooth, the people that matter to the organization don’t share these principles.
He, and literally every other Catholic, had a right to be angry.
Socialists don’t see a fundamental difference between a king or church owning the means of production and a merchant/capitalist/whatever owning it, because there isn’t a significant difference. Adam Smith was observing truths on the nature of property ownership and how to increase the gains from such, not describing the idea of rich and powerful people owning property that would make them money by exploiting the value of labor. That idea is as old as agriculture.
Where it might get tricky is if the gains from owning the “relic” were funding welfare programs/charity more than they were funding the excessive lifestyle of the clergy, but that’s not something Catholics are particularly known for living up to, responsible usage of tithes and actually following the precepts of ascetism in the clergy.
I DEMAND to know Aragorn’s tax policy.
You want a divine monarchy, Tolkien? Fine. At least prove it’s an effective one!
I think you’ll be okay after one box.
Yes, yes, we all know what happens when you scratch a liberal but it’s better than not having to scratch to find it. Even if all that’s holding the powers that be back is a skin-deep veneer of civility and deniability a vote to strip that veneer away makes you a fool, not a revolutionary.