ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 6 months agoReady set goimagemessage-square38linkfedilinkarrow-up1752arrow-down112
arrow-up1740arrow-down1imageReady set goByteOnBikes@discuss.online to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 6 months agomessage-square38linkfedilink
minus-squareAlcoholicorn@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·6 months agoDo you not have an internal experience?
minus-squareuncouple9831@lemmy.zipdeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoOf course I do, that doesn’t mean we understand it.
minus-squareAlcoholicorn@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoI don’t need to understand consciousness to be confident a llm is not conscious. Dogs are glorified barking machines. Is a tape playing a tape of a dog barking have the consciousness or intellegence of a dog?
minus-squareuncouple9831@lemmy.zipdeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoAre dogs conscious? What about mites?
minus-squareAlcoholicorn@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoProbably, their interactions with humans/dogs suggest they have a “theory of mind”. Mites? No.
minus-squareZos_Kia@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoYou can’t prove that I do, I can’t prove that you do. Those metaphysical arguments don’t have much punch in a scientific conversation.
Do you not have an internal experience?
Of course I do, that doesn’t mean we understand it.
I don’t need to understand consciousness to be confident a llm is not conscious.
Dogs are glorified barking machines. Is a tape playing a tape of a dog barking have the consciousness or intellegence of a dog?
Are dogs conscious? What about mites?
Probably, their interactions with humans/dogs suggest they have a “theory of mind”.
Mites? No.
You can’t prove that I do, I can’t prove that you do. Those metaphysical arguments don’t have much punch in a scientific conversation.