I’m pretty new to self-hosting, and the NAS I’m using right now has been a pain since the moment I bought it. The Synology DS220+ just doesn’t have enough CPU power for my needs, and I’ve recently used up all the disk space I installed, so I’m looking for a new server.

Unfortunately, all the options I’ve found online prioritize storage space over CPU, and I haven’t had much luck finding anything that fits my needs.

Requirements: CPU: Intel Core i3 or higher, but preferably Core i5 GPU: Not needed RAM: max 64 GB, min 16 GB Storage: max 32 TB, min 10 TB Network: 10 GB SPF+ Price: max 6K CAD, preferred 3K CAD

I’m hoping to run TrueNAS Scale with Plex and Nextcloud installed, and my media library isn’t likely to get larger than 5 TB, so CPU is really the main limiter of my current NAS.

As an example of something almost perfect: The TrueNAS mini X+ and R varieties would work excellently, but don’t meet the CPU requirement. I wanted to look at the other systems on offer from TrueNAS, but they don’t list out CPU specs for anything more advanced than the Mini line.

Of the Lenovo stuff, since it was one of the few websites with a filterable picker, the ThinkSystem SR630 V2 was the closest of fitting my requirements. It comes short on the CPU, though, and is verging on the price limit too. I also don’t need 12 TB of RAM, or 1.2 PB of storage.

What do you use? Can you recommend any websites I can go to find something that fits my needs better?

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    4 months ago

    Have you considered just beige boxing a server yourself? My home server is a mini-ITX board from Asus running a Core i5, 32GB of RAM and a stack of SATA HDDs all stuffed in a smaller case. Nothing fancy, just hardware picked to fulfill my needs.

    Limiting yourself to bespoke systems means limiting yourself to what someone else wanted to build. The main downside to building it yourself is ensuring hardware comparability with the OS/software you want to run. If you are willing to take that on, you can tailor your server to just what you want.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      My home server literally was just my old desktop for the longest time. I upgraded the components in my desktop, and put them into another case and that became my server. Proxmox is based on Debian so any remotely sane hardware should be supported well, then I just virtualize everything else (including the NAS) and hardware compatibility isn’t even a concern.

      My current case is a Fracal Define R4 which natively supports 7 hard drives + 3 5.25 slots so I could add hot swap bays there. If I need more storage I have an extra drive cage, and the suggestion from people online is to just zip tie it to the normal one, and that gets me 11 drives of storage. Sure it won’t look pretty, but it works, it’s cheap, and it’s scalable, and that’s all that matters.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is the answer.

      I’m currently running 2 boxes, one an old desktop with space for 8 full-size drives (which it has). The other is a Dell SFF with three 2.5" drives as a media server/testbed.

      Hard to heat either one for the cost. To buy the equivalent of the SFF as a pre-built NAS, I’d have to spend $1500.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you think about what the “S” in “NAS” is you’ll realize why they prioritize storage…

    You want a general purpose server.

  • pezhore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    I would consider using your Synology for what it’s good at - storage.

    My homelab has a Synology DS1618 and servers are Lenovo M90q systems. They have enough compute to get the job done, and use the Synology NFS mount for storage.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Exactly. It’s plenty useful for Network-Attached-Storage. That’s what it’s built for.

      Your network needs are a bit over the top, but maybe consider the Minisforum MS-01. Small form factor, i5 or i9, up to 96G. RAM, and 2x SFP, and some low profile PCIE space if needed in the future. This is WAY more than you need for your service needs, and you can just expand your Synology disks for extra storage super easily. Saves money, and solves your problems without needing a full rack-sized server.

      • SethranKada@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Thank you so much! After searching it up online, the Minisforum MS-01 seems to check off every box I’d had when I went looking.

        I’ll look around to see if there is anything more suited, but for now, it seems like what I’ll end up going with.

        • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I was here to say the same as pezhore, separating storage and compute is almost as important as separating church and state. Muck around, break things, have fun, all the while your data is safe (don’t forget offline backups though). The MS-01 is a fine looking box, but any old NUC / SFF will do for your purposes (modern AMD cpu or a graphics card if you need / want plex transcode).

          Edit to add, old laptops are great compute nodes (maybe moreso from my ex corporate thinkpad laptop bias, but still)…

        • just_another_person@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          This is a new model they’ve released, and I’ve been looking for something similar for a certain purpose for almost a year. There isn’t much lol.

          For my specific project, I ended up using a Fractal Design Ridge case, and the components that fit within because I needed a GPU. The MS-01 was JUST shy in the PCIE to make it my preferred device. Maybe have a look at the Fractal Design Ridge case and a Mini-ITX AMD build if you really want to stretch your dollar and get more performance-per-watt like I did. The cost will be about the same.

    • thequickben@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Second this suggestion. I run a synology NAS as well and it works great for that. My applications run on another box that mounts storage via NFS.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ha I came here to suggest the nas killer too. I built the nas killer 3 and it’s been running great for years.

      • __init__@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’ve been considering moving to this build in particular for lower power usage and heat output, but they have some other dual socket builds if you want more cpu power.

      • Skunk@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I was going to post the same link, I generally take inspiration from that forum and then adapt with what I can find on eBay etc for cheap. The prices they give are for US eBay and not always suitable to EU eBay.

        I’ve just finished my new NAS using Unraid OS and some info from the forum.

        • Jonsbo N3 case
        • Gigabyte Z590i Vision D motherboard
        • Intel i5 10400T
        • 2x16Gb DDR4 2666 (basic corsair)
        • LSI 9207-8i HBA in IT-Mode
        • An old 128Gb M2 SSD
        • 8x6Tb HGST SAS drives
        • Corsair SF600 PSU

        It took me more than 6 months to find all the parts at a correct price but I was not in a rush.

        It’s 2.5Gbe and not 10Gb SFP but you get the idea. The cost was really low (lower than 1000) because I already had the HDDs from an older server. It should be around 1500€ max with the disks.

        The real downside of doing that is the time it takes but it’s also a kind of pleasure to hunt for parts and one day assemble them all.

          • Skunk@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah I love it. It’s one of the only itx case with 8 hdds and a SAS backplate.

            Honestly it was the hardest part to find, I waited for months before having an auction on one.

            • __init__@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I’m in the process of divorcing my one giant server into separate nas and compute-only machines, I was going to leave the big one as the nas and maybe swap out its guts for something more power efficient than the dual socket beast since it will only need to handle storage now, but it might be easier to sell as a whole and do an all new itx build 🤔

              My wallet is gonna hate me.

              • Skunk@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                I feel you. This ITX build is replacing a giant supermicro dual everything beast. I just kept its HDDs and moved everything to the Unraid ITX + some docker running on a M2 MacMini that is always on anyway.

                I said to myself that I’ll resell the supermicro on auctions but still haven’t started to disassemble it.

                Fun fact about divorce. A cute Jonsbo N3 with big Noctua fans is way more for peace and love at home than a 20Kg Supermicro chassis.

  • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Rack mount server class machines at home generally aren’t great options. Definitely stick with tower/mini designs.

    That said, for a home server a general workstation may be best. I personally have a System 76 Thelio. I added a second drive and installed proxmox with a ZFS mirrored pool.

    https://system76.com/desktops

    • biptoot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I disagree! They can be great options, inexpensive and reliable. My current home server is a Dell r620 with xeon CPUs, 64gbs of RAM, and 2 terabytes storage in raid 5. It serves several vms, a mix of Windows and Linux. More than enough for many home set ups. Boots the os off a 16gb flash card. Cost me $185. Thing has been a tank.

      I bought two short L brackets from home Depot, and have it hanging flat against the wall. It’s been fabulous.

      • variants@possumpat.io
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I just went with a sliger case and shoved my old gaming mobo in there and with my router and everything else in a rack it’s nice to keep everything quiet and not that hot. I think rack mount is the way to go, before that I just had a table with things all over

  • root@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    No one has brought up Unraid OS specifically yet. Others have said just build your own machine, and yes absolutely this is the way. And then just slap Unraid on that and you have yourself exactly what you’re looking for. It’s user friendly, as powerful as your wallet can handle, and plenty of room for expandability.

  • Mikelius@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    My solution to this question a year or so ago was to take my gaming desktop, which was collecting dust after I moved to my gaming laptop, and gut it down to a 4U server rack case. Best decision I’ve ever made. 12 core Ryzen and 128gb memory. Got a 10g adapter in the pci express, 8xHDD for data and then 2 mirrored nvme for the OS itself. Only thing I kept out was the video card since I had no use for it (yet)

    An equivalent “server” on the market would probably cost a fortune and cost you a ridiculous amount of electricity.

    • SethranKada@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, the Minisforum Ms-01 was suggested a lot, and as far as I can tell, its nearly perfect. After reading thtough the comments on this post, I’m planning on buying one or two on a few months.

      I’m a bit concerned about the risks associated with having storage and compute on the same device, but I can always get a regular nas for storage later.

      • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        If you buy three of them you can set up a Ceph cluster I suppose ahah. That would solve part of your issue of having storage and compute on the same node.

  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Lots of good suggestions here

    I’m a bit surprised by your budget. For something just running plex and next cloud, you shouldn’t need a 6 or even 3k system. I run my server on found parts, adding up to just $600-$700 dollars including (used) SAS drives. It runs probably a dozen docker containers, a dns server, and homeassistant. I don’t even remember what cpu I have because it was such a small consideration when I was finding parts.

    I’d recommend keeping g your synology as a simple Nas (maybe next cloud too, depending on how you’re using it) and then get a second box with whatever you need for plex. Unless you’re transcoding multiple 4k videos at once, your cpu/GPU really don’t need much power. I don’t even have a dedicated GPU in mine, but I’m basically unable to do live 4k transcodes (this is fine for me)

    • SethranKada@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      To be fair, the budget isn’t so much a question of “how much I have”, but rather a question of “how long am I willing to save up”

      The 3K figure I used in my post was based on the relative price of similar systems I’d found online that “mostly” for the bill of what I was looking for.

      Systems that actually had the kind of CPU I was looking for often ran in the range of 7K, which would take me about two to three years to save up for.

      And while yes, I was looking in the wrong catagory, as far as I can tell they don’t sell non-NAS systems. I wasn’t able the find a single example of a server designed for CPU tasks until I posted here and was recommended the Minisforum MS-01. Which is, admittedly, overkill in the extreme, but at least I won’t have to upgrade for a long while, and I only have to save up for 3 or 4 months to afford it!

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s why I asked how many drives they needed. The one in question can support up to 4 NVMe drives and 2 SATA drives simultaneously.

        This one comes in i3 as well.

        Can’t imagine most people actually need 10 gbit, and that’s a large additional expense.

    • ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I was wondering if they were doing CPU transcoding in plex instead of using a client that supports direct playback. A few Apple TVs can generally do the trick at a much lower cost and double as YouTube and other streaming services clients.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Are you looking at Dell/HP/Lenovo’s sites? Don’t do that, those are going to be way overpriced and way overkill. Also most of them are rack servers, not really suited to home use. If anything, you’d want to spec it out as a tower workstation.

    Personally I build mine out of parts, and usually used parts. Currently I’m using a little U-NAS NS-410 case, and I replaced all the internals with something better. Total cost was less than $400, I think.

  • epyon22@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    I made the jump to a full server a few years ago and there’s some pretty high limits but you can get them spec’ed pretty low. Something like a dell r730 Single 8 core xenon 32gb ram and a couple tb of storage running 4-500$. They can be upgraded over time to be dual 16 core xenon 1tb ram and petabyte of storage.

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    I bought a used desktop with 4 SATA ports. Has i5 7th gen and currently 5 TB and an 500GB SSD and has max ram of 64GB. I guess the HDD are not included in the price?

    I’m not sure what your software requirements are but if you go the DIY route a desktop works. I made the BIOS auto turn on on power restored and have services start on startup so it gives the server feeling.

    Bonus is that you can use it as a gaming server and upgrade the components easily for a while depending on the motherboard.

  • walden@sub.wetshaving.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    I recommend just getting either:

    1. A cheap prebuilt desktop computer, or
    2. Build yourself a computer

    It doesn’t have to be a “server”.

  • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    For many reasons I would go used. There are used server vendors which have great machines for a reasonable price. You can of course build your own with that money but if you go used you will have a beast which will likely run for decades still.