US liberals and US conservatives both share the core ideals of Liberalism, including the right to private property

They differ only in where they think individual liberty ends.

Skill issue.

Yup, I ended up frankensteining a nas from various craigslist parts (i actually found a low-power business-class server motherboard that has worked out well for the purpose). Had to get a SAS HBA card and a couple SFF-8087 cables to do the job right, and I grabbed an old gaming case from the 2010’s to hold it all, but it was relatively seamless. I had one of the drives go out already, but luckily I had it in a raid configuration with parity so it was just a matter of swapping out the drives and rebuilding.

It’s been fun and rewarding, for sure! I’m glad I didn’t sell them like these other dweebs told me to lol

There’s maybe two problems with this:

• public housing is a part of the picture, and so are public libraries. The solution is certainly not to cut library spending just because there are homeless people using it
• Thinking there being homeless people around is an issue that needs solving is itself pretty bigoted. Like, maybe you have a problem with people who haven’t showered for a while? or people who use the library for personal activities because there are no better places for them to do them? But ‘these people are a problem’ itself becomes problematic because you’ve consolidated those qualities you find objectionable into a class of person, and that makes it really easy to forget/misplace/dismiss the humanity those people deserve.

It’s a common attitude, so don’t feel like i’m picking you out personally to scold. More people should be aware of how that attitude dehumanizes people experiencing shelter insecurity.

This is the entire issue for me.

Privatizing what is otherwise public content, and then privatizing the models that are trained on that content and making me pay for having it regurgitated back at me.

I think AI would be really cool, IF:

• it wasn’t being shoved into every goddamn thing
• it wasn’t being used as justification to cut jobs
• it was a open source project and wasn’t being gatekept by capitalist interests

Yea, I don’t think the se runs it out of the box but I’ve heard an rpi can be used

I got the se a couple months ago, unfortunately it doesn’t use klipper without modding it with a rpi as far as I know

Is mockery not an insult? I’m learning so much today

“i feel like you’re being combative, you’re not engaging with what I’m saying. Makes me think you’re just here to be an asshole”

[Doesn’t engage the content, lobs insults, ‘he did it first’]

“I can see why you might have been banned”

“What do you mean I’m being totally reasonable?!”

There’s something about this format that just feels good, ya know? Like I’m invisible to criticism. I wonder why more people don’t use it

“I get banned for no reason”

Lol yea I can see that

Reminds me of this scene in the big short:

Rabbi Scene

Yup, I was only pointing out that i was having trouble doing the same thing in my docker compose (using the webui_port env variable did not avoid port collisions at deployment)

I haven’t tried this particular compose outline though. It could also be the pirate_network they’re initiating or the depends_on variables they’re using, I just haven’t played around with it yet.

Question: how are you deploying your arr apps? do you do that in a separate compose file?

AFAIK the thing that complicates this is trying to run it behind gluetun

docker makes it really easy to specify a unique port on deployment, but when you’re using a network bridge (as in the case of gluetun) the networking settings are controlled there instead, so you can’t use the normal port declarations. It’s apparently not impossible to do it with gluetun but it seems it’s not as straightforward.

lmao. I’m starting to really wonder what the WEBGUI_PORT variable does if not exactly what you’re changing in the GUI… someone else mentioned they got multiple instances to deploy from the same compose file by placing the gluetun service at the end of the file. I wonder if the order in which the containers are deployed is the thing that makes this work. i’ll test more when I have the time

I might need to try this… I wonder if it makes a difference that the gluetun service is listed last. I noticed that trying to start the containers in the wrong order results in port collision errors, maybe this is why it works for you?

This worked!!

Shame that it’s a little bit of a runaround, but not only did this work, it also persists after restarts and updates.

I’ll be editing my post and offering it as a solution to the other places I have seen this question asked, thank you a ton!

I’m looking at hotio now.

their documentation isn’t as comprehensive as linuxserver.io, i’ll probably have to just try it out and see if it works. looks like they also have one that has wireguard bundled but it’s really unclear how that works

Can I ask what your compose file looks like? Or how you deployed?

yea, i just tried a couple things to no avail:

publish a new port in gluetun, e.g. - 8082:8082 then set webui port in the new instance:

- environment:
  - WEBUI_PORT: 8082

error on deployment

Then I tried spinning up the new container separately, declaring the pots eg:

- ports:
  - 8082:8082

and then manually switching the network to gluetun and turning off the port declaration, and it still ends up on the default port. Bummer.