• Nollij@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s supposed to be, though. A SCOTUS ruling like that is supposed to be, and traditionally has been, a confirmation that the laws (all things considered) already say it. You don’t need a new law, the interpreter/referee says the current laws already cover it.

    The problems right now are a corrupt judiciary, and a government that does not represent nor even resemble the populace.

    • Globeparasite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      is supposed to be, and traditionally has been

      corrupt judiciary, and a government that does not represent nor even resemble the populace which is why I promote writing down everything into law