• surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    And their dicks are all fifteen inches. And people never lie on surveys.

    Edit: If you think critically about it, that means for every 25-year-old having sex for the first time, you need two 10-year-olds that got laid to offset it. That doesn’t pass the sniff test.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s not that I believe that the currently known figures are accurate, but that I’m still waiting for a source for “early 20s”. That commenter made a specific claim with nothing to back it up. Could just as well be 19, or 29.

      • daannii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have reference. For the U.S.

        https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db366.htm

        Data from 2015 2017.

        In 2015–2017, 42% of never-married female teenagers aged 15–19 and 38% of never-married male teenagers had had sexual intercourse; the percentage declined by 17% for male teenagers between 2002 and 2015–2017.

        And some newer data. https://www.cdc.gov/yrbs/dstr/index.html

        This site here uses that data and made easy to read graphs.

        https://opa.hhs.gov/adolescent-health/adolescent-sexual-and-reproductive-health/data-and-statistics-on-adolescent-sexual-and-reproductive-health

        Like this one.

        Showing most kids graduate high school without having had intercourse yet.

        Another gov site with data for 2024.

        https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/134957

          • daannii@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s exclusion criteria.

            In some states, those with high Mormon populations, teenagers are married. And so that doesn’t represent the rest of the country. So these individuals are excluded.

            They also don’t count same sex , sexual activity, oral or anal sex. Or anything other than “penis in vagina”.

            That info would be for a different kind of study.

            • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              But why are those not interesting for this study? It kinda feels like the question they want to answer is “how many teenager are having premarital sex, i.e. dirty sinners” instead of “what is people’s age of first sex”. Which would also mean that lots of teenagers would feel encouraged to claim that they’re virgins when they actually aren’t.

              • daannii@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Because that would be a different study.

                You could compare their behaviors to non married teens or whatever else.

                Or compare the homosexual and bi teens to hetero ones.

                I’m sure such studies do exist.

                But you can’t just have all these wild card variables lumped together.

                In research you have to try to use parameters that best represent a population if you are doing a study on general trends.

                It’s very common to exclude anyone who isn’t “average” from a study on average behaviors.

                Especially when you know already that there are systematic differences.

                For example. Married teens, always hetero, are engaging in sex.

                That would distort the actual numbers if you added them into your computations.