Godric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agoFinally an explanationimagemessage-square276linkfedilinkarrow-up1853arrow-down145
arrow-up1808arrow-down1imageFinally an explanationGodric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square276linkfedilink
minus-squarejamesrandysghost@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down2·2 months agoTolerance paradox in action!
minus-squareBeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 months agoI remember being told it makes more sense when you realize it’s a part of the social contract. Breaching it prevents you from taking part in it.
minus-squareHonytawk@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·2 months agoIndeed. If one side breaks the contract, the other isn’t bound by it anymore either.
minus-squareHonytawk@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down4·2 months agoThe tolerance paradox does not exist. See BeardedSquidwards comment.
minus-squarewpb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoI don’t see it. How does a society tolerating the intolerant not enable them to be intolerant, even if you believe in social contract theory?
minus-squarejamesrandysghost@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoI think you need to re-read the comment…
Tolerance paradox in action!
I remember being told it makes more sense when you realize it’s a part of the social contract. Breaching it prevents you from taking part in it.
Indeed. If one side breaks the contract, the other isn’t bound by it anymore either.
The tolerance paradox does not exist. See BeardedSquidwards comment.
I don’t see it. How does a society tolerating the intolerant not enable them to be intolerant, even if you believe in social contract theory?
I think you need to re-read the comment…