ickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 13 days agoDiabolicalimagemessage-square45linkfedilinkarrow-up11.07Karrow-down19
arrow-up11.06Karrow-down1imageDiabolicalickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 13 days agomessage-square45linkfedilink
minus-squarevillage604@adultswim.fanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·13 days agoThen that snippet wouldn’t be admissible in court.
minus-squarevateso5074@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down6·edit-213 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareVerat@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·13 days agoIf the prosecution obtains it as evidence, I would think evidence handling procedure would make said discarding a no-go.
minus-squarevateso5074@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down7·edit-213 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareSerinus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·13 days agoHow many things will you make up to avoid just being wrong? You should try AI. It’s pretty good at telling you what you want to hear.
Then that snippet wouldn’t be admissible in court.
deleted by creator
If the prosecution obtains it as evidence, I would think evidence handling procedure would make said discarding a no-go.
deleted by creator
How many things will you make up to avoid just being wrong?
You should try AI. It’s pretty good at telling you what you want to hear.
deleted by creator