I can never not upvote the never slop kitto, but after zooming in, I think this may actually be one of the original images that was stolen and fed to the slop machines.
Wow, it’s weird how that completely change my mind about it. It has several things that point to AI IMO. A lazily done background plant wouldn’t have several of the odd details that it has, and all of those are common AI red flags. Lines “drawn” from an outside edge to an inside detail in a weird way is the most obvious one.
I don’t see any signs of this being slop. Am I already losing my ability to tell?
I can never not upvote the never slop kitto, but after zooming in, I think this may actually be one of the original images that was stolen and fed to the slop machines.
It’s gonna get hard telling original images that were bitcrushed by reuploads and ai images that look bitcrushed because of not enough passes.
The only part that looks a little odd to me is the plant on the left
Wow, it’s weird how that completely change my mind about it. It has several things that point to AI IMO. A lazily done background plant wouldn’t have several of the odd details that it has, and all of those are common AI red flags. Lines “drawn” from an outside edge to an inside detail in a weird way is the most obvious one.
I might be wrong, maybe thia style was stolen by AI and that’s why it reminds me of it now.
Also, it seems a bit yellow, I think.
Maybe it’s made out of styrene and OP left it out in the sun.
This reminds me of “out of context terrible WikiHow artwork” memes. Here’s one I found randomly on their front page