They’ve done it before in the USA. My guess is that they want to push their non-English offerings, which is something they’ve only focused on recently.

Chocolate is food and is used in some Mexican sauces. It just happens to be that the most typical modern use is chocolate is in candy.

Mexico has been trying a lot to reduce obesity through various product labeling. This looks like a step in that direction; a snack that uses an indigenous ingredient (chocolate) in a manner that complies with federal guidelines.

There is also a lot more driving in the USA, even in a decent transit area like Chicago.

The City of Charlottesville has a master plan which includes infrastructure upgrades and expanding their business network.

https://www.charlottesville.gov/1666/Transit-Strategic-Plan-TSP

It sounds like the people suing don’t want to ride the bus.

Probably not. The state has been implementing Vision Zero as a statewide program along with several cities.

The two major highways have lower than average accidents due to design.

One of the state’s signature traffic configurations, the Jersey Jughandle, eliminates left turn movements on older highways, a major source of accidents.

Mainly if other countries believe it is a country and treat it as a country. You can look at Taiwan as an example. For all intents and purposes, it acts as a country. Yet, almost all countries do not classify Taiwan as a country, so it isn’t really a country.

In modern days, recognition of being a country is generally handled by the UN as it is an organization of countries which recognize each other.

One has less squishy noises than the other.

The problem is that wealth inequality in the USA has an age component.

Boomers are far wealthier than previous generations at their equivalent age as a percentage of national wealth. They are also incredibly sensitive to taxes as their retirement depends on managing wealth.

In contrast, Gen X and millennials are poorer than Boomers at their equivalent age and mainly contribute to the economy with their labor.

It isn’t a perfect divide, but there is a wealth divide that represents itself somewhat as a generational divide.

And honestly, the cashier doesn’t deserve hearing the rest of it unless they ask why.

For a while, there was generally an international consensus that nuclear weapon proliferation was bad, mainly because it was thought that the likelihood of using nuclear weapons would go up as more nations had them.

It was wrong for Trump to ditch the Iranian nuclear deal, but the original deal was a deal with most of the major nuclear powers including Russia and China. There was an international interest to prevent nuclear proliferation.

I don’t think it is right for the US to attack Iran regarding nuclear proliferation as Trump has been negotiating in bad faith, but that it is the idea where developing nuclear weapons is a bad thing which requires an international response comes from.

That thing? That thing? That thiiiiinnnng?

At that point, Lemmy would no longer be a Reddit like site. The experience would be functionally very different, probably more like a federated Tumblr.

It sounds more like "I don’t want to shower and will use any excuse to not shower.

Tags without communities would upend how Lemmy works. You would need instance based moderation instead of community moderation in order for that to work. You would also run into problems if a post is tagged with multiple tags, since that could mean a different sets of mod rules applied to the same post.

It isn’t. The full name, including everything after the @ is the name of the community. They act differently and should be treated different.

To put it another way using email as an example, we wouldn’t treat matt.smith@gmail.com as the same as matt.smith@bbc.co.uk.

I’m talking about implementation.

A lot of people come into Lemmy assuming that the federation is uniform when it isn’t. There are two different groups of people between .world and .ml, let alone more specialized instances.

Just because the community name is the same doesn’t mean the community is the same.

That assumes the “mirrored” communities are mirrors of each other. The instance that the community is hosted in really affects the community.

That assumes the “mirrored” communities are mirrors of each other. The instance that the community is hosted in really affects the community.

Just another list in a long line of gay exclusion.