• reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      As in “I gave it to you for free. And you overcharged everyone for it.”

      • BossDj@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        But let’s also be fair, as in “I gave it to them for free out of convenience while getting rid of the stuff that I’d feel bad just throwing away”

        • reddig33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I wouldn’t say donating to Goodwill is convenient. It’s more convenient to just throw it away. And reduce/reuse/recycle is a good thing. The bad thing here is Goodwill is blocking the three Rs by marking up the price. Which means they will probably just throw it away eventually because no one will buy it for that. Hopefully they will at least send it to a garment recycler later so that it’s laundered and then shredded to either r make new clothing, or stuffing for pillows or boxing bags.

          • BossDj@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s why I said “that I’d feel bad throwing away”.

            The stages for high end go like this: sent to “goodwill boutique” and/or listed online. Sent to cheaper local goodwill with markdown. Added to cheap-item-Sunday (for ones that still do that). Sent to bulk outlet (where people fill a bag and pay one price for entire bag or by the pound). Finally, recyclers

            So they don’t block it so much as delay I suppose. But they’ve gotten good at regionalizing their processes

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      If they’re free market then they aren’t a thrift store, charity, or a non profit.

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        They’re non-profit because the profit isn’t their focus - they have a specific mission. They’re a charity because they use the money they raise for a social cause. It’s free market because they set prices based on the buying behavior of the public. When they price too high, more of the public decides not to buy or buys elsewhere.

        It can be all three.

          • AmidFuror@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            So what you wrote before was not what you meant. You meant because they deceptively market themselves, they aren’t a thrift store, charity, or non-profit.

            I don’t know enough about Goodwill to be able to judge that. I’m only saying that charities selling goods, even donated goods, at market prices to raise money for their cause is not at odds with their status or necessarily their mission.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Sorry sometimes I do steps in my head. But yeah charity doesn’t come from a place of deception. If they said we’re selling to the middle class to raise money for the lower classes then that would be okay.