Only thing I don’t like about it is the visual representation of the villain as a cleancut man with glasses and the good guy as a short haired chubby dude.
You know what a pedophile looks like? Literally anybody.
In a comic where there is one panel dedicated to the depiction of a nonce, who I agree could look like literally anybody, how would you have preferred the artist represent every type of person? Some sort of shifting miasma? A vague cloud? One of those stroke pictures where nothing is quite what it looks like? Michael Jackson’s Black or White video?
I think there is a specific stereotype of creepy men with swept hair who wear glasses. Fun fact, Visual Acuity does not correlate with sex crimes. Clark Kent has never had allegations against him.
Only thing I don’t like about it is the visual representation of the villain as a cleancut man with glasses and the good guy as a short haired chubby dude.
You know what a pedophile looks like? Literally anybody.
In a comic where there is one panel dedicated to the depiction of a nonce, who I agree could look like literally anybody, how would you have preferred the artist represent every type of person? Some sort of shifting miasma? A vague cloud? One of those stroke pictures where nothing is quite what it looks like? Michael Jackson’s Black or White video?
Stick people. And use exactly the same image for both.
I think there is a specific stereotype of creepy men with swept hair who wear glasses. Fun fact, Visual Acuity does not correlate with sex crimes. Clark Kent has never had allegations against him.