• Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Nah their arguments are invalid because they aren’t based in logic or economic theory.

      • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Because I dont want the most vulnerable folks in our society to just fuxking die. People have chronic conditions that require daily medical care that would not be available for the vast majority of folks in an anarcho capitalist society, if they were available at all. I used to love fantasizing about zombie apocalypses and the fall of society myself, untll i realized my partner who is a Type 1 Diabetic probably wouldnt live long in that future. Wanting an anarcho capitalist future is the highest indicator that you live a life of extreme privilege and dont care about fellow human beings.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          Okay, fair enough, and I am by no means intending to criticize you for your kindheartedness here, but that’s literally the opposite of economic theory, which concerns itself primarily with achieving the maximum output possible given a certain input.

          Also, consider that this does not mean that it is therefore by nature entirely inhuman and incompatible with caring about people, but rather that the ability to achieve a high productivity is required in order to have an excess of resources than can be used to care for those who cannot care for themselves.

          If you think about it, this is in fact essential to maintain human life. Children for instance always require more resources than they can produce, so parents have to be able to produce more than they need for themselves if they want their children to survive. Same goes for society as a whole — the productive members have to be able to produce an excess or the unproductive (weak, sick, or old) will starve.

          • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            No shit it doesnt require economic theory when basic logic tells us its a terrible way to organize a society.

              • JayObey711@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Ok, so if I ever meet you in our anarcocapitalist future I will bash your head in and steal your house. Gonna call the police?

                • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I made a number of well-reasoned and coherent arguments, to which responded with flippant one liners.

                  You’re free to convince me that I misjudged you by actually making an argument, but I’m afraid your childish insults aren’t going to change my mind anytime soon.

                  • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Lmao no you didnt. You’re an idiot wasting my time. So bye bye now.

          • Programmer Belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            So you are saying we will produce in excess and give all of the excess to people who can’t produce (children, weak, sick, old…) So from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs?