It’s just the special effects department showing off.
It’s just the special effects department showing off.
They can get pretty big, but the ones I encounter are generally about the size of my big toenail.
There were individual books per person.
In my childhood household, at all times, there were in-progress books on the back of the commode. You would simply select the one relevant to you.
Or long-click / long tap the back button.
That’s fair enough. Hope you’re enjoying your scrolling!
Did you go back a month in my history to comment on this or stumble upon it naturally?
Also acronyms, again depending on whom you ask. At least based on my own instincts and online searching.
Joseph Gordon-Levitt was setup to be Robin in the final entry of that series.
Reminiscent of an old Windows screensaver.
I call my toddler “Little Bean” as a term of endearment (well predating my knowledge of lemmy, let alone this trend). I just showed this picture to my wife and said it was a representation of our toddler when they’re an adult.
My wife rolled her eyes at me.
edit: Clarification.
I don’t remember watching Cars 2, but did the OBD port say anything about this?
Hopefully it doesn’t need to be said that representation is important in media and I don’t want to diminish anyone with a disability. This is just a joke.
This may or may not be an official definition, but in my retail experience a lemon anything is something that has been returned as defective three or more times.
It’s fine if you are and fine if you aren’t, but this message kinda seems to contrast with your other posts in this thread.
In this very comment you said “having a weird hobby.” There’s nothing wrong with having a weird hobby, but it’s not normal.
None of my favorite people are “normal.” So long as their hobbies don’t cause harm to anyone, that’s fine.
My feelings toward furries are entirely neutral and I don’t support the claim that normality is a positive automatically.
That said, I disagree with your claim.
I agree. My intent is not to defend the design, only to explain that the car does not physically prevent you from opening the doors. If it did, I doubt it could legally have gone to market, though I’ve been disappointed before.
In the case of my car, it’s actually primarily for my wife. She has a cricut and printed out stickers indicating the various hidden ways to interact with the car.
Also, in my experience, almost every adult who has tried to open the door from within has asked what would happen if the battery died, so after their first time exiting they theoretically know how to exit in an emergency.
Not a good design or UX - Tesla is way too obsessed with minimalism - but not automatically a casket.
I have many objections to Musk and Tesla, but I bought a used Model 3 before learning about all the insanity. The doors are designed to open with power, it’s true; this is because they were built without a top frame, apparently to reduce weight, so the powered button lowers the window as the door opens to avoid damaging the glass.
However, there is an emergency lever (that would be easy to miss for sure) that just mechanically opens the door with no need for power. I have used this once to make sure it works and can confirm it exists and functions. Presumably, this is true of the Model Y as well; I can’t imagine that a vehicle could pass any kind of inspection if there were no way to get out without power.
Okay, but where are Yakko and Wakko?
Ancient video time!
https://youtu.be/yWYvl_AIIbU