I think security is a fair point, given caddy’s younger age compared to nginx, but I wouldn’t say it tried to do too much.
I think security is a fair point, given caddy’s younger age compared to nginx, but I wouldn’t say it tried to do too much.
Why do you say that?
I’ve used both plenty and only once I thought Caddy was harder: caching. It requires you to install a plugin that also doesn’t have the easiest of configs. I think there’s a new and simpler one nowadays, but haven’t tried it yet.
I now use Caddy by default for everything new I make/host.
The web font would also be cached, and it wouldn’t be that big of a resource in the first place. I think being able to copy a comment’s content is more important, but whatever.
True, an RCE is always a serious thing. Just saying it’s not exactly catastrophic like others have been more so.
Yeah, exactly. Very impracticable.
musl isn’t vulnerable, as per https://fosstodon.org/@musl/112711796005712271
That is strange. Check the logs show anything out of the ordinary.
That’s the “Local link” I included in the post body.
Incredible update, well worth the wait!
Congrats to everyone involved :D
We’ll be fiiiiine 🥲 starts hyperventilating
This is a good suggestion. Docker is more mature and has more resources, so it’s better to learn the ins and outs of containers. After getting comfortable with it, you can move to Podman and have a much better time tackling its peculiarities regarding permissions and rootless.
I used Docker for years and only recently decided to give Podman a try, porting my Lemmy instance to it.