The two paths merged reveal a third option: the manbear.

No, I’m sorry. Zionists gotta project everywhere, now that people in the mainstream are aware of what’s truly happening.

How long until it turns into a Satanist? Considering he’s supposed to be all moral, I can’t help but think that at some point it does an A/B and reaches the correct conclusion.

If there’s a Toyota underneath, then this is a better Cybertruck than Tesla’s Cybertruck.

Speaking trout to power.

30s my dude. My how the turn tables.

*sigh*.… the second one…

Have both your driveshaft and chakras aligned.

Nordics: what about summer solstice? It’s so nice to see that big ball of heat in the sky stay for weeks, as a nice treat before the darkness starts to reclaim the world, as it will all things in the end…

Everybody’s dead, Dave…

Peg-Leg sue, ya daft **** on a ******** **** ****** **** ********** ******* and DON’T feckin’ walk there, she just swabbed the deck.

What? There are plenty of communist Lemmy subs you can ask in. I just think you haven’t tried hard enough.

To answer your question tho, no - because there would be no need. Communism does want mandatory participation, but if checked and balanced correctly everyone would work within their limits and not be relegated to a lower class of living - because that’s sort of the point of communism. You’d work within your means until there was time to retire without being limited in access to services and goods. Theoretically, under a functioning communist system, there would be no manufactured scarcity.

Tbh I believe both communism and our current form of capitalism centralises power and ownership way too much. Social-capitalism, or even libertarian socialism, might be the ticket. It would undo at least 200 years of psy-ops and gamed laws designed to favour the rich and vesting power in them, which is the issue of centralised power that we’re facing today - in what some call “late-stage capitalism” - or what I call the breaking point of society under a predatory, exploitative and imperialistic form of capitalism that seems more like the privatisation of the aristocracy than the supposed liberalisation of economy. Transparency, accountability and consequences for people in power and wealth is what’s sorely needed.

PS: New public management is a con-job disguised as decentralisation meant to encumber governments under the guise of checking and balancing them, being effectively a psy-op in of itself to make people hate public services and taxes. As per usual, goddamn liberals - and I include socially conservative liberals in that polifical grouping. Dems and pubs are the same, want the same institutions and promote US imperialism - not fiscal independence, no matter what justification and mental gymnastics they put in the form of spreadsheets.

PPS: Also, additionally, commodification of the housing market was a mistake. It will always be stupid and harmful towards society.

…well of course it’s beneficial to their product, and a detriment against everyone else, which is why I called it a conflict of interest.

Either that, or you used the wrong word. Care to elaborate?

The logic is a little problematic, because it also means you mislead ordinary users, and honestly the infosec industry has a conflict of interest as well.

They all just stop, let out a digital shriek, as all the LED’s turn blood red…

Prepare for the wreckoning…

House owner: That’s $499 for a new key.

Tested it again no. No thumbnail does not equal not working :P even has audio, which Racoon doesn’t have - at least after testing it a bit more than I did Eternity.

WebM video worked in:

• Connect for Lemmy
• Voyager (web client)
• Eternity

It does not work on:

• Racoon (video only, no audio)
• Thunder

Chile and their heart attack inducing hot dogs… and suddenly I want one.

Jesus Mutant Superstar.