Its even worse when unwrapping the thing and it lands in the urinal.

I read books about social studies and think I may fall into the same camp. What books do woman deem sexy?

🙃😕😟😭😒 ← my emotions illustrated through emojis.

Lemm.ee seems fairly safe. Also grad, hex and some other communities are interactable there.

Got a link for hi rez first imagine, make for an awesome monitor background.

We can donate so much a month so a haul to Mars would take years. Also these expedition may get larger with crew capacity.

Its early days yet and this is just one method there will be a dozen more by the time we actually start traversing distant planets.

I know this is a meme but actually looking into this is very interesting, the question being answered is “how can we build on distant planets” which scientists from Manchester university have tried to answer with human waste products and space dust. Any food production on a ship will be for consumption so while potato’s are a good choice on earth in reality growing potato’s on distant planets pose more question than answers.

Best of luck with your new air freshener

Relatable

taken on the Devon moors of Britain just coming out of winter. was a stunning still day and surprisingly warm too.

i have one but im a freckly boy

Relatable.

is she a junky or something?

I found him, only because I had this book as a child.

its so annoying having to use tongs :/

If your a leftist make sure to join a party

https://github.com/squid-slime
waybar will likely break unless your monitor is the same res as mine

Build and fund a Marxist think tank, think tank of the Proletariat

I’ve seen wayland related names that are much less eloquent

well i say if we can go from feudalism to mercantilism to capitalism then why not capitalism to socialism to communism? its again distributing power from the top to the lower status classes, we saw similar in feudalism to mercantilism.

Wealth distribution is not equal under communism. Most is owned by the state, the privileged class still exists. The underprivileged class also exists.

• wealth distribution should be equal under communism, wealth not being equal means we must do better. we don’t look at corrupt corporations and think “to bad its fucked best not make any more”
• under socialism most would be owned and redistributed by the state. communism is worker lead and not state lead at least in my school of socialism.
• under socialism the unprivileged class gets lifted through the transitional period. class distinctions are to be removed through the transitional period leading to a classless communist society.

Communism tends to be inefficient and less productive than capitalism, so a lot less is produced. This is demonstrated time and again. People just don’t have a personal motivation to increases production for the state. Distribution is also inefficient. Historically it leads to hunger because central planning is less effective than a decentralized system where individuals are able to make decisions.

• i cant argue communism and its efficiency as i have yet to see it but i am sure socialism can be made to be more efficient. being from the UK and having the carcass of what was once our publicly owned NHS i know that after WW2 under a Labour government we saw the NHS rise from nothing within 3 years, Labour at the time were socialist. the NHS was revolutionary at the time. we also mass built affordable housing. these are all things we struggle to achieve now.

So while I agree that the current level of wealth inequality is not good, communism is certainly not the solution. All it does is change where the lines of inequality are drawn. It usually kills a few million people for no good reason, too.

so your a reformist?