That would be wrong in every technical sense. You’re saying that .first()
would skip the 0th item.
First = leftmost.
That would be wrong in every technical sense. You’re saying that .first()
would skip the 0th item.
First = leftmost.
This is the only acceptable answer
Need a citation for that one chief, I’m pretty sure it says your body is a temple to be respected and cared for.
Usually programming. Or trying out an odd peripheral. But other than that, normal usage, it still breaks.
That’s not my experience, I love the feature.
Because they expect you to listen to the voicemail and then call back at your convenience. If you hate it, get a visual voicemail app to transcribe them for you.
That way, you’ll at least be able to side-eye it and consider helping when your mother calls because she has fallen in the tub.
Invisible because there is a T nearby
Unfortunately, $100 isn’t enough to satisfy varying tastes, while also leaving out no one. Aside from that, kids didn’t recognize sacrifice, nor were most of them taught the manners to say “No, but thank you.”
Honestly, I think you probably should have known.
In my experience, windows always gets something wrong with drivers and I have to go do some stupid shit to fix it. And then later fight windows update as it tries to override my fix. Windows problems are rarely immediately apparent, whereas Linux problems usually are.
No, they have serial numbers that are read by the printer when you try to use them. Air Gap the printer.
The sun. Does the earth and moon orbit a gravitational center that they share? Does that center revolve around the sun? How imperceptible is this, considering the shared point is likely inside the earth given the difference between its mass and lua’s?
As far as I’m concerned each side has been just as annoying and incorrect as the other. Have you seen some of the stupid and objectively false things people say? It’s not just conservatives.
I upped because I don’t understand the perspective of the downies
Dude that’s a generalization and is just not true.
Absolutely, but it’s still useful. Allegedly Alfred Binet did not approve of the eventual applications of the test he designed.
I don’t know, when I got tested it seemed like they were testing the right stuff.
I’m pretty sure it’s a well-made test that provides fairly accurate results. Even if what they claim to be measuring in each category isn’t reflected in the test, it is, at the very least measuring the abilities required to take the test and that exactly.
It seems pretty straightforward to see how good a kid is at solving a puzzle, right?
There’s another way to think about it which I actually use. Look in the empty bin and say “zero”, then move an apple and say “one”.