sik0fewl

I am, but I think this story is actually a somewhat noteworthy.

Ya, I feel like disabling Javascript should not be “beyond standard practice”.

I think he could do an entire floor at this point.

This is not a standard. In this case it’s desirable to have more options.

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

Yeah, that’s why I shared it with OP 🙂. I’m pretty sure that between the two clauses I quoted in this thread that his licence does not meet the OSI definition.

Then maybe this clause is more appropriate:

The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research.

The Open Source Definition from the OSI has the clause:

The license must not discriminate against any person or group of persons.

And most people (that actually care about such things) would insist that “open source” must meet the criteria of the OSD to actually be open source.

It’s neither free software (as defined by the Free Software Foundation) or open source (as defined by the Open Source Initiative).

But it’s such a killer filesystem!

No no no. It’s a public API so it doesn’t count!

Five stars also means “this was just delivered to me and I haven’t even used it yet”.

I miss del.icio.us. Simpler times.

Ecoterrorists finally figured it out.