• 0 Posts
  • 9 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 19th, 2025

help-circle
  • explanation

    a cuck chair is a lonesome chair, or one that stands out in such a way, usually facing the bed in a hotel room; a chair that a cuck could reasonably use.

    a cuck is someone who enjoys watching their partner have sex with another person (usually called the bull) while not participating themselves, so they’d be sitting on that chair.

    since these chairs are high up and overlooking the bed, the commenter is imagining two people/cucks sitting on these chairs like in a theater and commenting on the sexual performance. “it’s so hard” would be the first person’s comment about the erection of the bull’s genitals and “hard to watch” is the other person’s comment about the sexual act actually being unamusing or boring to watch. i assume these puppet characters speak in a similar way where they make wordplays and laugh about them together.


  • i use arch because i find it much easier to start from a system with just a tty and install software i need than to have a full distro and to find and remove packages that i don’t want/need and replace them with the ones i need - makes maintenance easy and i know what’s running on my system. it’s also in my experience one of the few rare distros that package a non-broken fcitx5 which i rely on (but that’s specific to my setup). and the build system is awesome. the community might be a bit harsh on people who post error messages to forums without any attempts at basic troubleshooting.

    i expect that people who make these memes installed arch because they heard that it’s a bleeding edge distro that all the kool kidz use, downloaded a bunch of packages from the AUR which messed up their dependencies after the update and now their system isn’t booting right. if you don’t skip updates for a long time and don’t do weird tricks with system packages, arch might be genuinely one of the easiest distros once you get past the installation which can be tedious if you’re used to automated installers.


  • or… people could at least try to be accomodating? if there was a horny community, people who are interested would join it and people who aren’t could block it. since we’re apparently not having that, then they should at least use nsfw tags in existing communities. or not evade blocks. what the original commenter proposed is just one solution that makes it easy.

    if you block a whole community because of a few bad apples, you’ll also cut yourself off from the majority of posters who post interesting stuff.


  • this has nothing to do with an office or being opposed to nsfw because i’m opening lemmy in public. some of us just don’t want to be involved with sexual stuff even if no one else is viewing my screen.

    i replied to your comment because i don’t agree with your expressed stance that we should let nsfw go unchecked and push away people who don’t like that because they’re apparently prudes. why should the onus be on people like that and not on people who don’t use nsfw tags and evade blocks?

    the original commenter’s suggestion up top would mostly solve the issue. you disagreed with it, so i commented to disagree with your comment, and noted that i see this as a consent issue.

    also i imagine moving to a sfw-only instance does nothing if the posts aren’t tagged as not sfw. it’s also not my goal. i don’t mind having an option to unblur a nsfw post. but i find it problematic when it’s effectively forced onto the timeline.


  • isn’t posting untagged nsfw into general/meme communities against respecting consent? some people don’t want sexual stuff on the timeline, yet your solution is that those people are pruders and should leave instead of encouraging nsfw posters to categorize their nsfw media properly.

    if the rest of the fediverse can do it then i don’t see why lemmy shouldn’t.



  • ruby@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldCiao
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    24 days ago

    last time i saw that user’s profile, all of the posts were sexual. many of them not even really memes. posts about having intercourse with old men, wearing revealing clothes in the club and so on. i don’t think any of them were tagged, so the user themselves doesn’t care and apparently neither do the mods of the communities wherever it was posted to.

    no one’s pushing the nsfw users out, just wanting a mechanism for users who don’t want that stuff in the timeline to filter it out. why should people play whack-a-mole with people who don’t tag their horny posts properly and people who keep remaking accounts every other month?


  • ruby@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldCiao
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    24 days ago

    i find it dissapointing how the nsfw community preaches that consent is key, but at the same time when someone doesn’t consent to being exposed to porn by default then they’re a prude and should make new communities on their own.

    the least they could do is tag their nsfw posts as nsfw, which they consistently don’t do.