I try to respond to every genuine engagement. I block trolls, contrarians, and provocateurs because life is too short.

  • 0 Posts
  • 179 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 29th, 2025

help-circle
  • I don’t really run into ads so no.

    All I’m saying is I’ve seen many beautiful ladies age with a very similar change in facial structure from Megan’s before and after photos at top in 20 years (and yeah, it’s semi-shockingly been ~20 years between those photos).

    P. S. Yeah you’re right Laura Loomer. That’s definitely surgery on her, much larger change and shorter time-scale.




  • pulsewidth@lemmy.worldtoPebble@lemmy.ml•Pebble Round 2 Starts Shipping!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    So what’s the dealio with Pebble as far as privacy and FOSS?

    It’s open source? I see it claims to be, but I’m dubious because it’s Google that agreed to OS it, and it relies on Google Play (can also only install from Google store) so I presume it has some deep tendrils in the backend, hoovering up data.

    Anyone know if it works OK on MicroG etc? I’ve never had a smartwatch, but if I was to try one the Pebble at least looks interesting.

    Cheers














  • What a reactionary zealot response.

    This is a dumb exclusionary policy being fairly pointed out, not ageism.

    I’ll explain it with a comparision of the language used.

    The language used for benches like this in my country, Australia: “Priority seating. Please stand for seniors, pregnant, or handicapped people”.

    Priority, based on needs. Anyone can use it otherwise.

    The language used in this sign: “Benches are for seniors are handicapped citizens only”

    Exclusionary, based on privilege and needs. If you are old and infirm and a citizen ONLY YOU may ever use this bench, and if you’re not a citizen (tourist, asylum seeker, migrant worker) you can fuck off regardless of your needs. Pregnant women? Who cares, they’re not old and they’re women.

    This is not a subtle distinction. This is language used to assert a hierarchy and exclude underclasses, and it’s embedded into every aspect of US society without most people even noticing because they’ve never seen different.


  • I disagree wholeheartedly. This is a dumb exclusionary policy being fairly pointed out, not ageism.

    I’ll explain it with a comparision of the language used.

    The language used for benches like this in my country, Australia: “Priority seating. Please stand for seniors and handicapped people”.

    Priority, based on needs. Anyone can use it otherwise.

    The language used in this sign: “Benches are for seniors are handicapped citizens only”

    Exclusionary, based on privilege and needs. If you are old and infirm and a citizen ONLY YOU may ever use this bench, and if you’re not a citizen (tourist, asylum seeker, migrant worker) you can fuck off regardless of your needs.

    This is not a subtle distinction. This is language used to assert a hierarchy and exclude underclasses, and it’s embedded into every aspect of your society without most people even noticing because they’ve never seen different.