null

It was a different game back then. They could hit a lot harder.

Chat, is this real?

“Fuck them kids.”

It’s a similar story for the multiple Facebook communities for where I live. They handed a lot of bans during covid era while pushing anti-vax rhetoric.

The site took a hard stance against “violent content” after their IPO. Saying you think Luigi is innocent or that you agree with what he did will get you a ban for inciting violence. Saying you think punching nazis is a form of self-defense will get you a ban for inciting violence. Posting information about ICE agents is inciting violence.

The site is about circle-jerking to SFW memes and content while bots subtly recommend products and services.

A little bit of both. I ran a private wiki for writers to collaborate on for a project. I was doing other tech stuff for the team so it was my job to deal with it. Keeping it updated was a chore and actually using it was finicky.

For example, there was an issue we ran into where we wanted a dynamic table that pulled from other pages. Think of a shopkeeper inventory or something similar where each item was another page. Displaying an item worked fine the first time you pulled it, but if you updated the item’s page it wouldn’t push that to any page it’s displayed on. We ran into issues like this constantly. Some solutions worked, others didn’t.

After a year or so we migrated to something else. It’s free and it’s great that it exists, but it just has a roughness to it that we didn’t have the resources to deal with.

I’ve used mediawiki and I hated maintaining it. Absolutely do not recommend other than as a last resort.

“The algorithm” pushes outrage content because it’s so radioactive that it even gets you to post it here. It’s just that potent.

Kek

I wonder if they would use the same argument on a photo of someone receiving gender-affirming care.