• 0 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 8th, 2023

help-circle



  • novibe@lemmy.mltomemes@lemmy.worldI could see benefits and drawbacks
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    That does make intuitive sense, but archeology shows otherwise. There was a much bigger diversity of gender roles and relationship structures/child rearing systems, including in agricultural societies.

    The modern almost universal ideal of romantic monogamous nuclear relationships was born from romantic (as in the movement) puritan petit bourgeois ideals in the 19th century.

    Working class women during the medieval age for example, worked and lived outside the home, had affairs etc. This changed around the 18th century with the hegemony of the bourgeoisie and working class mirroring of their ideals.

    Basically while it’s true that patriarchal strictly dichotomous societies existed for as long as we can tell, And that they have prevailed and “won out”. But doesn’t mean they are the norm for humanity. Their universality is extremely recent.







  • What is your definition of working? I’d say communist revolutions have indeed worked. I base that on data, facts and the material conditions of places that had a revolution compared to countries in similar economic and geopolitical situations.

    Cuba is doing much better than most Latin American countries. In most areas it’s doing MUCH better.

    China is doing infinitely better than any other comparable country, like India. It’s not even a comparison.

    The USSR was also doing much better than any country in a comparable situation when it did exist.

    How did these revolutions “not work”?