honestly i expected the fifth panel to be full of things like “GIL”, “2to3”, “virtualenv” “pip vs conda vs poetry vs…”, “mypy”, etc
honestly i expected the fifth panel to be full of things like “GIL”, “2to3”, “virtualenv” “pip vs conda vs poetry vs…”, “mypy”, etc
i don’t think any manufacturer publishes the voltage their devices run at, could be anywhere from 3.3 to 5V. so i don’t know how an end-user is supposed to compare battery sizes between devices.
you would be a bit peeved as well if one guy in a lecture hall with 150 people constantly asked you to convert every measurement in your talk to something only that guy understands.
the spec is 10 chapters. everything is unquoted by default, so parsers must be able to guess the data type of every value, and will silently convert them if_they are, but leave them alone otherwise. there are 63 possible combinations of string type. “no” and “on” are both valid booleans. it supports sexagesimal numbers for some reason, using the colon as a separator just like for objects. other things of this nature.
is this a good time to remind everyone of the horrific implications of cars 2?
well in my language they’re “runners” so i guess i should have thought a bit harder there…
my patreon bill is about $100 a month, I have a nebula subscription, and i pay for dropout, so yes i do.
and i pay those people if i engage with their creations. i still get ads in their videos, so i use sponsorblock.
advertising is emotional manipulation that i do not wish to be subjected to when not actively seeking it out. doesn’t matter if it’s done out of necessity, give me as a viewer a way to support you directly if that’s the situation.
jesters? they’re bishops…
you could always paste it into the browser and see what it makes, but it looks to be a lot of the same color…
yeah, Uniper is a major stakeholder in the Oskarshamn and Forsmark power plants, and it was absorbed into the German state in 2022.
mfer nationalised the comments section just like they did the swedish nuclear power plants
no, the frog explicitly dies having not noticed.
not only that imo, with this extra layer it serves to illustrate how the complacency is not innate. everybody has a breaking point, but we have been told that we will just take it if it is gradual enough.
i learned recently that this is a false premise; the frogs will get out when the water gets too warm for them. which imo makes its proliferation even more apt; it makes sense that they would, but we’ve so used to the narrative that we keep this factoid going without questioning it.
never heard that before. one can easily train their own model on just a single celeb’s face (since there are usually so many pictures of a given celeb) and use that on their own machine.
they are also working on a follow-up, uv. not really a fan of writing tooling in another language but it works really well.