keiko

The demo site seems to work without javascripts, and the main site’s “Why this exists” lists “an interface that works with JavaScript switched off” as one of the reasons.

If that’s the adult-consent thing, it can be bypassed using web dev tools to delete the blur and the click-prevention things. That’s the only way I was able to see the site at all.

my lsd advice: if there are things which deserve your tears, don’t hold them back, feel your feelings to their greatest depths, try to understand yourself and your place in this world, try to understand the world and its place in you, and as always, be kind to yourself 🩷

Doesn’t look that way to me, but I’m not here to argue about it. Idk what else to say, so I’ll probably just leave it there and hope my original comment was worth sharing in the first place.

I hadn’t considered that, but it’s possible. The vehicle is parked with the window open while the person in the driver’s seat is taking pics of the child hiding from the large animal whose head is entirely inside the vehicle. So yeah, I can see how the driver could have also intentionally lured the animal to approach in the first place. But regardless, they seem to be intentionally abusing that child. Otherwise, why leave the car parked with the window open as a large animal approaches, and why take pics of the child instead of helping them? Like, if it somehow happened so quickly that they couldn’t have prevented it, why start taking pics instead of pushing the animal back out? Why not drive away?

I was sharing the mechanism for copying between vms within Qubes OS, which is a bit different from traditional operating systems. First you copy to the clipboard of the current qube, then copy to the shared clipboard, then paste from the shared clipboard into the clipboard of the destination qube, and finally paste within that destination qube.

Ctrl+C → Ctrl+Shift+C → Ctrl+Shift+V → Ctrl+V 👑 🧊

Hi, I know this is just a shitpost, but I feel the need to say something serious about it for a sec. I find the image unsettling. Deliberately violating a child’s personal space boundaries like that, where they can’t escape the situation, for a pic and a laugh at their expense, I see as a form of child abuse. Like, if you look at the kid’s face, you should be able to see it. Right? It just feels bad to see a pic like that being used as a meme template. And I’m not saying anyone is a bad person for using or enjoying the meme/template. I’m just asking and hoping that you please think on it and reconsider how you feel about it.

I think the core issue in situations like these is that you are made to lack a baseline feeling of comfort in your home. Fear of germs can be a rationalization to justify the bad feelings, and it can also be used by others to dismiss your feelings. We each need to feel a baseline of control over our own bodies, and that can be disrupted by the persistent actions of others when those actions unavoidably affect us. I think that such living conditions can act as a sort of feedback loop, in which your need for a feeling of cleanliness becomes stronger in response to the grossness you perceive around you, while your attempts to get them to be more mindful of their actions might cause them to “double-down” on the very things causing your distress. You maybe only ever feel safe and comfortable in your room, or if it’s shared with others then maybe not even there.

You are not unreasonable to have these feelings; your feelings are valid.

I hope your post at least grants you some assurance that you are not the problem.