Hail consumerism

Damn thanks for explaining all that, i didnt know any of that

Pedophilia is a mental disorder Just saying mind your words

Looks like the mafia

Apex predator of the lake

Casual reminder that many religious rules were just basic Hygiene practices from prehistoric times which were later absorbed into the local beliefs.

Ah yes my favourite, all other information is propaganda.

Cuba seems to be a great country, people there most definitely have great lives. Freedom_of_the_press_in_Cuba Elections in cuba

Laos has been governed by the Lao People’s Revolutionary Party, under which non-governmental organisations have routinely characterised the country’s human rights record as poor, citing repeated abuses such as torture, restrictions on civil liberties and persecution of minorities.

laos

human rights vietnam

DPRK = north korea

Sure are great countries you listed there…

For the record i dont want to doubt that marxism would be a nice experience but the lack of non ass, real countries makes me do so

If its so much better there how come you dont live there?

Provided you say that russia / china are in fact not communist, what would be a real existing (or past) communist country in which a large amount of people have lived?

Hold on, is there friendly fire?

36 keys… I will outpace you, including special characters and numbers

… modern … Object oriented

wat?

Bro that shits like 30 years old and most langs released after lets say 2010 have put that stuff in the backseat for backwards compatibility. Anyway I get your point

operate any arbitrary interface

Dont believe it. Behold the shittyness of modern UI

*Apostels

Wrong, see first bullet point https://www.stopkillinggames.com/eci

You dont need bots to ruin a game, ddos is sufficient and cheap enough to come by, probably even easier in the future. Argument 2 already covered in other comment below

It may be true that it may not actually happen. However:

• I have elaborated on monetization in another long comment.
• it cannot be wrong to have monetary interest in your product.
• A law (which is the goal afaik) needs to account for unlikely scenarios, thats why its usually so hard to make new ones

I am not against leaving games playable, but the fact that people like the game means that the devs did a good job and their fate needs to be accounted for. Devs who make good games are not an enemy

Stop killing games said that games need to be kept in a functioning state afaik. That means exactly that. I am very for modding games but modding a game does not entitle me to the original creators intellectual property, but merely the part j have added.

Also what documentation? :)

This still doesn’t cover for the abuse of studios which is the main concern here, after all making games harder to kill off shouldn’t come with making the production or maintenance more risky or significantly mor expensive. A malicious party trying to kill a game because they dont like it or part of the community is still a valid motive.

Regarding your Question, minecraft servers are a good example of this: there are many servers out there which monetise in game resources or grind shorteners for real world money. I dont think that it is a stretch to say that a non sandbox game could be adjusted to work in such fashion. Also the point is not that there are other options, but that someone may easily make money with stuff the dont own and have never contributed to in its making.

At the end of the day all of us still want new games to be made. Therefore we need to accept that the people making them need to be able to have a steady income doing their job. Monetising ones own creation is, and should be, well within your rights. Even if some of us dont like it providing a platform in form of a game, as a service / with ever fresh content can be a valid value proposition and there are many studios out there doing this successfully while being well respected, think of Deep rock galactic or path of exile.

If you want to make this a law, how would anyone handle this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3jMKeg9S-s&t=73

This argument holds true for developers of all sizes and is somehow totally ignored by most here.

What if youre working with library types? The problem is not not you compare a bunch of fields but that the implementation on those members is most likely bad.