I suppose it’s “confusing perspective” worthy.

Then I hope it won’t get any traction.

I hope this is a joke and not intended to be real.

I want to see the 10x hamsters!

I had no idea! Thank you for the great explanation.

You can use pencils as supports too

West-sex wessex
South-sex sussex
East-sex essex but no
North-sex Nossex?

Shots fired! Shots fired!

It’s not the real issue. I introduced that while anonymizing the data. It’s that a 3-5 liner code became a huge switch case by just incrementing the code and never thinking how it should be done. This was caused by like 15 engineers in time :)

Something like below would be huge improvement:

subs1 = ["cluster1", "cluster2"]
if subs1.contains(clusterName) return subs1

Oh I feel old already. I even forgot about this.