- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
Dupelet@piefed.socialtoLemmy Support@lemmy.ml•Moderation tools for dealing with users that always vote down posts in a community?English
31·10 days agoI did! Most of the arguments against basically boil down to ‘make it harder for the average user to do this’. In addition to the unequal access to information, sites like lemvote demonstrate how easy it will be for the average user to bypass the imaginary technical barrier. Sure, you may block it now, but as the Threadiverse grows so will the number of sites and such that do so. Even a browser extension ala RES. Even without the whack-a-mole issue, it’s only a matter of time before somebody sets up such an utility for public access with an obfuscated instance that can’t be easily blocked.
Dupelet@piefed.socialtoLemmy Support@lemmy.ml•Moderation tools for dealing with users that always vote down posts in a community?English
64·10 days agoSecurity via obscurity🙄
Google is not the arbiter of knowledge, but the combined search engines are certainly a decent indexer of it. To claim something is ‘common knowledge’ when we’re unable to find a hint of it anywhere online, and is based solely on something you read a couple decades ago, is pretty ridiculous.
Honestly if it was something you read 20 years ago and there’s nothing about it to be found today, there’s a chance it was nothing but racist nonsense. (Not saying you’re racist or anything, just that the source might have been and you got taken in).
Do you have a link I can read? I’m referring specifically to the part about centuries of built up excrement.
Is that actually a thing? I can find results on Google about their crappy sewage system being overwhelmed, but nothing like what you’re mentioning.


I know, but seeing as most of the content comes from the book…