dreamy (she/her)

I’m sorry that you see objective reality as a matter of political opinion.

In general, this corresponds to the way people of the political left want to see the conflict represented. Of course, Muslims expect it to be: essentially to take the Palestinian side and to portray Israel as a genocidal regime. I supported Jimmy Wales when he intervened in the article “Gaza genocide” and said, maybe he should not be called that and the introduction should contain more about the Israeli perspective. … I don’t even defend Israel very much. Israel has clearly done some wrong things, the Palestinians too.

And what the fuck is this “Israeli perspective”? Holy fucking shit the enlightened centrism here is disgusting. Having a ‘neutral tone’ doesn’t equate to putting both objective reality and utter bullshit on the same level. No neutral encyclopedia needs to put “but flat Earth is another plausible explanation” at the beginning of an article about Earth, the same way they don’t need to put “Pallywood muslims might be getting killed on camera for TikTok” in an article about what is happening in Gaza. Israel is objectively committing a genocide. Anybody who denies this, or says that “But Palestinians are bad too!!” is a disgusting shitstain upon humanity.

Nah, it’s fine.

Do you have any pictures of it?

Ah, yes. Maladaptive daydreaming 🥰

FreeBSD’s Wi-Fi and sound card support is terrible and its browsers don’t support containerization though. You can get around its Wi-Fi issues with wifibox which runs an Alpine VM in the background and uses drivers from that, and use jails as containerization for browsers, but I’ve not found a solution for my audio not working as of yet.

I kinda enjoy it too, but Rudeus is just such a pos, and the writer probably is as well. I was so happy that we were getting nice, non-fetishistic Eris-focused episodes for the new season, but as of episode 3 we’re back to square one with this person 🤦‍♀️.

Edit:

…but that show I probably fast forward scenes more than any other…

Glad I’m not alone in this :D

lmao 😭

The study I linked is self-reported inclination. I think more data can be collected that way.

deleted by creator

It’d seem that there isn’t really that much research in this area. This is the only article I could find directly related to child SA, with a helpful conclusion:

In this work, we have established how people with attractions to children are seeking sexual satisfaction using a range of different forms of FSM depicting children. We found no evidence that engaging with sexual fantasy and various forms of FSM was associated with variance in self-reported willingness to engage in sexual offences involving children, despite substantial numbers in our sample expressing a willingness to engage in these behaviours. Instead, we found that those who were more sexually satisfied reported a lower level of willingness to engage in such behaviours, while those who held offence-supportive beliefs reported a higher willingness. We urge researchers and clinicians to use our work as a springboard for further studies on the pursuit of sexual satisfaction, the addressing of sexual frustration. All of this should be conducted within the context of reducing potential risk, while encouraging a more evidence-informed social conversation about the importance of sexuality considerations in this area.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19419899.2026.2619511#d1e4039

Though I think that banning lolicon drawings would just make pedophiles go and consume actual child pornography, which is arguably worse.

Yeah, it is.

Some people are weird as hell 😭

Who are they?

Wireguard isn’t what matters. What matters is how much personal data the VPN company collects and how they handle that personal data. In Mullvad’s case, they don’t need any personal information to sign up (you just generate an account number and can then pay via cash/monero for anonymity), and they don’t get any personal information when you use the service either as their servers are RAM-only so they can’t log anything.

No, LTT did in-video edits. They called them out because they had insane errors that could’ve been easily caught during editing in the first place, and their “fixes” were sometimes very unnoticeable by the viewer (just small text on the bottom correcting the information etc.).