Boof

  • 2 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle


  • dog@suppo.fiOPtoLinux@lemmy.worlddwm alternatives
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    No? Windows is installed as a VM in Proxmox, as I’ve mentioned couple times already.

    I do config Proxmox also from Windows, but I need to go back to the barebone Proxmox in case the VM has issues.

    Anyhow, this was about dwm alternatives.



  • dog@suppo.fiOPtoLinux@lemmy.worlddwm alternatives
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I mostly use win11 as my main os, and using proxmox as a base lets me properly use things like pihole, homeassistant, nextcloud, and other such services, because Windows really sucks for virtualizing those.

    And OS hopping is a lot easier when I have a backend like proxmox.

    Want to try arch but not sure if nvidia/wayland support is there yet? Roll up a gpu-p’d VM for it, instead of wiping the entire disk.

    Edit: To further elaborate on what I have setup.

    1. Go through the typical proxmox install.
    2. Get debian up to date.
    3. Add Librewolf’s sources.
    4. apt install picom lightdm dwm librewolf
    5. Reboot.
    6. Login to dwm via lightdm, and open up librewolf.
    7. Navigate to the web ui.
    8. Add W11 VM image to storage.
    9. Create a W11 VM.
    10. Install W11 via VNC.
    11. GPU-P + USB Passthrough to W11.
    12. You’re now in Windows.

  • dog@suppo.fiOPtoLinux@lemmy.worlddwm alternatives
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Commented on this twice already, so see those replies;

    I’m using the web ui, I just need to use it from dwm on the same system for the initial master vm configuration.

    After I have gpu-p and such configured, I can access the web ui from inside the vm.

    The question was though what other options than dwm would be more fit for me, and what’s available on debian/proxmox.

    Because while dwm is lightweight like i3, awesome, bspwm, etc, it’s not a great fit right now.












  • What we need isn’t browsers. What we need is an universal way to write extensions cross-browser.

    Browsers themselves are easy to make. The problem is convincing extension devs to work with yet another codebase.

    E: Think of it this way. There’s a lot of open source browsers out there.

    Are you using any of them? Probably not.

    Would you use one if it doesn’t have for example Bitwarden, Ublock Origin, Sponsorblock, and such mandatory extensions?

    Users follow extensions and ease of use; not what’s good for them.

    E2: A good project would be a builder extension for VSC for example, which compiles to all supported browsers.

    Browser devs would then contribute to said extension via native-made plugins.

    Cooperation of two fronts.