You do realize with more donations they can AFFORD to hire more people, and to get the help they need? Money is the solution. Let’s not downplay the value of it.
Boof
You do realize with more donations they can AFFORD to hire more people, and to get the help they need? Money is the solution. Let’s not downplay the value of it.
No? Windows is installed as a VM in Proxmox, as I’ve mentioned couple times already.
I do config Proxmox also from Windows, but I need to go back to the barebone Proxmox in case the VM has issues.
Anyhow, this was about dwm alternatives.
Why would I ever dualboot?
And plasma/gnome et al. don’t seem to work with proxmox.
Thus something like dwm.
I mostly use win11 as my main os, and using proxmox as a base lets me properly use things like pihole, homeassistant, nextcloud, and other such services, because Windows really sucks for virtualizing those.
And OS hopping is a lot easier when I have a backend like proxmox.
Want to try arch but not sure if nvidia/wayland support is there yet? Roll up a gpu-p’d VM for it, instead of wiping the entire disk.
Edit: To further elaborate on what I have setup.
apt install picom lightdm dwm librewolf
Commented on this twice already, so see those replies;
I’m using the web ui, I just need to use it from dwm on the same system for the initial master vm configuration.
After I have gpu-p and such configured, I can access the web ui from inside the vm.
The question was though what other options than dwm would be more fit for me, and what’s available on debian/proxmox.
Because while dwm is lightweight like i3, awesome, bspwm, etc, it’s not a great fit right now.
Probably shouldn’t, no.
But I have no other way to use proxmox.
Sure I can use tty to achieve some of the stuff, but that’s it.
Dwm is needed to properly configure Proxmox from the Web UI.
Proxmox doesn’t have a desktop by default? That’s why I need something like dwm.
From dwm I can access the web interface, shell, and everything else I need.
Try Windscribe, they offer residential and datacenter IP’s. I don’t get the point, but it’s your money.
I erroneously said the IP’s are less shared, but that’s not the case per the page.
But still, they get past more ip-blocking.
https://windscribe.com/staticips
After reading where I’m even posting: Renting a cheap VPS and using Wireguard to tunnel to it is also an option.
Then it really is only used by you.
See: Anything that can open ports. NAT of any kind tends to not allow opening ports.
You can get Let’s Encrypt certificates for DuckDNS, so you don’t even need to own anything.
Works with anything that can open ports. DuckDNS works by pinging their service from anywhere to update the target IP for the subdomain.
You do realize all this is easily done with a reverse proxy + DuckDNS?
What we need isn’t browsers. What we need is an universal way to write extensions cross-browser.
Browsers themselves are easy to make. The problem is convincing extension devs to work with yet another codebase.
E: Think of it this way. There’s a lot of open source browsers out there.
Are you using any of them? Probably not.
Would you use one if it doesn’t have for example Bitwarden, Ublock Origin, Sponsorblock, and such mandatory extensions?
Users follow extensions and ease of use; not what’s good for them.
E2: A good project would be a builder extension for VSC for example, which compiles to all supported browsers.
Browser devs would then contribute to said extension via native-made plugins.
Cooperation of two fronts.
Bookmarking this.
“Downgrading” from a Samsung S22 Ultra 128gb to Pixel 7a, planning to run Graphene on it.
The good ol fashioned,
<center><div>hecc</div></center>
div {display: inline-box; text-align: initial}
Fairly sure they just use IDE’s.
Or chatgpt.
Do Rust, Nim, etc use semicolons? I don’t remember
Does he stand on two legs from time to time? He may in fact not be a dog, but a duck.