…huh. TIL.
The last time I had to download the unifying software it was more obvious than that.
…huh. TIL.
The last time I had to download the unifying software it was more obvious than that.
And to add insult to injury…
To keep people from accidentally walking in?
You won’t mistake it for a closet if you have to enter a code to get in.
Okay, now we’re just making shit up
Self-aware wolves much?
Yep. For anyone who’s that serious about not having children, that’s more like an incentive.
Source: got snipped.
Now you’ve gotten your inventory counts off. There’s also a (marginal) cost difference between the two size cartons. Of course, this needs to be balanced against customer satisfaction- there will be a non-zero number of customers who won’t want the upsell or to buy an alternative item, and so the question is how much business would you lose vs how much money you’d make offset with the extra time and corporate headache of reconciling inventory?
Not that Sonic shouldn’t do this, just throwing out some real-world considerations.
You mean a buttbuttin?
Edit: Boost for Android won’t let me post it either.
Also Dude, Ameriga isn’t the preferred nomenclature. Traitor-American, please.
Like, I wish the Jews/Joe Biden/Democrats were as competent and cool as right-wing fearmongers make them sound.
what are you even doing with your life
Based on what he’s said here and over on politics, I’d say he’s trying to create division using whatever wedge issue he thinks will get the most outrage.
It breaks down significantly when the cost of entry becomes prohibitively expensive.
You think you can build a better toothbrush? Go for it.
You hate your ISP and want to start a new one? Good fucking luck.
For that price, I’m gonna go with “more running.” As in, “I’ve been doing more running because my car doesn’t work.”
Maybe if my neighbors stopped voting for the party that wants them to stay poor, they would have more opportunities besides being tools of American Imperialism?
Ads fucking suck, and what Google is doing definitely seems like monopolistic abuse, but there are much better arguments against Google than what you’re saying. You pay your ISP to access content, not paying for the content directly. Analogously, imagine being mad at McDonald’s for not giving you free drive-through food… because you pay road taxes.
As long as you have a Pro version. Home versions of Windows have Group Policy Editor disabled.
we are just processes running on a bio computer that’s our brain and nervous system.
We’re processes running on two bio computers, one of which is actively suppressed by the other. That’s our brain and nervous system.
It’s problematic to try to read that verse as just meaning “born” exactly because of the context. The whole passage is about restitution in two scenarios: a pregnant woman who is injured as a bystander from two men fighting and
suffers an unclear birth event with no additional damage
suffers an unclear birth event with additional damage.
Breaking it down that way, it seems apparent to me that the birth event must mean a miscarriage. If two men fight and that causes a woman to go into labor, but her child is safely delivered, what restitution would be owed? What harm has actually been caused? That actually eliminates scenario 1. The only way the whole passage makes any sense for the father to be owed payment is to see what property he has been deprived of- a potential child, or a potential child and his wife. And this just helps to reinforce the point: the punishment for causing the death of a person is not the same as for causing a miscarriage, which means that in the Old Testament unborn fetuses we’re not equal to people
And no, American Evangelicals do not allow any room for error in translation of the Bible, because they see it as God’s direct word to man and therefore it can’t be wrong.
Oh, if you want more fun, read them these two verses:
Exodus 21:12:
Anyone who assaults and kills another person must be put to death.
And Exodus 21:22:
When people who are fighting injure a pregnant woman so that she has a miscarriage but no other injury occurs, then the guilty party will be fined what the woman’s husband demands, as negotiated with the judges.
Then ask them why the punishment for killing a person is not the same as the punishment for causing a miscarriage.
After that, ask them why, if the Bible is the “inerrant” word of God, do some translations of that second verse use “miscarriage” while others say something more general like “caused a premature birth” instead? Because the meaning of that verse changes drastically depending on which way it’s translated.
At this point, you’ll probably be called a godless baby killer and uninvited from Thanksgiving dinner.
Only if you’re not a Trump supporter.