My only pair of earbuds have a wire. The connector is usb-c and my phone has a jack. So I don’t even use the jack now
3.5 headphones that have volume controls and a pause/hang up button can’t seem to last a year. I tried 2 and they both lasted 3 months
I wish implicit returns could be turned into an error in the configs of a project. It was impopular at the time and probably still is outside of Rust, it permeated through every control structure because of how the language is designed, but the worst part is how unnecessary it was
It would’ve cost nothing not to do it
It would’ve made no one upset
Now Rust is the only language to do what it does - and it has this shit in it
How would it depend?
The unholy chipotle order
That big part of you is fetishizing nuance and mistaking it for wisdom
Nuance doesn’t stand on its own, there is no sense saying something has merit because it has nuance. I can give 10 examples of things that would be moronic if you tried to add nuance into them. “Nazism bad”. “The crime of loitering shouldn’t exist”. “The planet is getting hotter”
That forest is built like an american city the way its missing its middle
All the same size!
Forests need to have old trees, young trees, bushes, fallen over trees, …!
The original local fauna couldn’t live in these!
Step up the reading comprehension please :)
It’s pretty funny having you state, re-state and re-re-state the exact same obvious things that everyone understands while not seeing that everyone gets that, that you’re missing the point, and that you’re yelling in a hole
Why do you keep going?
Are you that painfully unconvincing in real life like cmon
Step it up
Step up the reading comprehension please :)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A
(a) In General.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that— (1) (A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and (B) is obscene; or (2) (A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and (B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value; or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.
You’re really mad that a US based study is using the US definition of CSAM while also clearly stating the definition of CSAM they’re using, aren’t you?
Sure buddy, it’s a “false equivalence”, they’re totally stating it’s the same. It’s not just your reading comprehension
They’re studying the prevalence of CSAM under the definition of the country they’re in. It’d be arbitrary to separate the two and make two different conclusions.
Also you seriously need to take a chill pill
The study is transparent about their definition of CSAM. At this point, if you don’t get it, you don’t get it. Sorry dude.
“treating them the same” => The threshold for being banned is just already crossed at the lolicon level.
From the perspective of the park, pissing in a pond and fighting a dude both get you thrown out. That doesn’t mean you’re “treating them the same”. You’re just the park.
Do you get it now?
Who places the bar for “exclusion from a social network” at felonies? Any kind child porn has no place on the fediverse, simulated or otherwise. That doesn’t mean they’re equal offenses, you’re just not responsible for carrying out anything other than cleaning out your porch.
Hey, people can read what you write. Stop making stuff up.
He invented the stupid take he’s fighting against. Nobody equated “ink on paper” with “actual rape against children”.
The bar to cross to be filtered out of the federation isn’t rape. Lolicon is already above the threshold, it’s embarrassing that he doesn’t realize that.
Repeating over and over again that I’m equating drawings with rape isn’t going to cut it if people can just read what I wrote. Especially when nobody was even talking about rape in the first place
Step up the reading comprehension please
Oh yes, to an extent. But it will go much different if the porn doesn’t involve depictions of children. I think you’re in denial
I’d never bother changing whatever default font the editor comes with and I don’t understand why anyone would care to