• 36 Posts
  • 202 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2023

help-circle
  • This is kind of an unpopular take among present company, but I believe there is some genuine cause for concern.

    I’m gonna sandwich this with a loud declaration that I am not an AI booster, I’m not rube, and I agree that this is used as an excuse for state hacking and for criti-hype. And I do not fall for the diversion in responsibility onto “the AIs”: I hold human beings and companies responsible for the risks and harms.

    That said, I encourage people to check out this video by Computerphile, a channel I consider to be run by sensible experts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giTmBaNGaHw

    Put basically, these random number generators are genuinely capable of acting in ways that are not easy to predict; they ARE capable of doing things that are dangerous or harmful to people and societies. They pose a risk as a result of bad actors doing harm deliberately as well as careless actors causing unintended harm. And the possibility that the risks these systems pose may be growing at a rate that will lead to catastrophic harms before we recognize the scale of risk is not something I dismiss.

    Again, I’m not a booster, I’m not a fan, I don’t believe these systems are self aware or responsible for “their” actions, etc and so forth.




  • First: I don’t consider the term “Tankie” nebulous because I only apply it to people who self-identify as such.

    Similarly, I don’t go around bringing up authoritarianism. When someone else brings it up to defend it, I generally roll my eyes and move along.

    Personally, I find this line of reasoning about definitions semantic in the least productive way. It’s just Loki’s Wager. So with all due respect, I don’t wish to debate you. I answered your question in good faith and I’m content to leave it at that.



  • I think “authoritarian” is a principle of concentration and protection of power in the same way “democracy” is a conceptual term for structured collective guidance and oversight of an operation, and “anarchy” is the principle of maximizing agency of groups and minimizing the ability of any party to wield coercive power, etc.

    They’re concepts.

    My interest isn’t in categorizing and ranking nation states, it’s in examining and weighing the qualities of different approaches.

    When someone says that a term like “authoritarianism” is meaningless, I just don’t feel like having an arugment. It’s like ‘I don’t see color’ or ‘age of consent? I think maturity is what matters.’ Alright, have a great day, I’m gonna go over there.








  • Respectfully, this site has a real problem with ‘claplause’ memes.

    Claplause is a term I heard comedian Roy Wood Jr. use in an interview for when a comedian relies on saying things that are popular to get people to cheer and clap rather than things that are funny enough to make an audience laugh.

    Israel is a genocidal apartheid state; Trump is a disgusting idiot racist serial sexual abuser; both parties in the US are functionally controlled by the same cohort of fascistic child molesting oligarchs; artificial intelligence is a golden calf worshiped by a doomsday cult that controls our economy; yes: we all know these things.

    I want to be clear: as an anti-Zionist I am not offended by this meme because it critiques an ethno-supremacist police state. But I am tired of all the low-tier memes with no real joke.

    Here is my constructive advice on making better memes:

    Consider what the truth at the heart of a joke is, and make it something that really feels like it needs to be said. ‘Israel is a cancer’ is boring, because that’s not an edgy or unique take.

    Take something timely, and say something about it. For example: take the weird liberal white-washing of Israeli fascism. Then find a good, moderately popular meme template. Add some meme-coded text like ‘When you doin’ a genocide but sprinkle some [pride flag emoji] on it’.

    I’m not a big Iran-stan, but have you seen their Lego videos? Pretty dank. Try something like that.





  • Andy@slrpnk.nettoMemes@lemmy.ml•Great Moments in Leftism
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    This comic is dumb because it’s unproductive.

    Criticizing democratic socialists for engaging in electoralism and making political compromises is unproductive: doing so by itself isn’t helping build working class power.

    Funnily enough, the same is true about defending democratic socialists’ political compromises: it’s also unproductive. It ALSO doesn’t do something to build working class power. Both are dumb, because they don’t lead to anything but internet debates.

    You know what’s based? Promoting actions and ideas that build working class power.

    A comic about the DSA supporting candidates for the purpose of harm reduction while also training for revolutionary action? Based.

    A comic about a moderate democratic socialist voting for a progressive Democrat three times and seeing their candidate get co-opted and then knocking on doors for a communist candidate? Based.

    A comic about a non-voter getting yelled at by a democratic socialist about voting while loading up supplies to go support striking workers? Based.

    Go ahead and criticize the DSA. I’m cool with that. But if your idea stops at ‘and that’s why that kind of lefitism sucks’ then you’re wasting everyone’s time. We don’t need more lefties discouraging lefties: we need folks promoting better alternatives to whatever it is they don’t like.




  • This. Arguing with people online is – with all due respect – a complete waste of time if your goal is to change the world.

    Ignore the people who have dumb opinions. It isn’t as though if you win 500 arguments Elon Musk donates all his money to Socialism.

    Go join a tenant’s union or a mutual aid society. Go build the alternative world that doesn’t transfer all our money upward.

    (Also, though, if you do this long enough there will likely be a revolution. But that part comes after you feed and shelter enough people that it begins to become a threat to capital. It’s downstream. Either way, don’t bother trying to persuade strangers on the internet,)