Actually, it was the train that has come the long way.

It might look like you’re moving when you focus completely on the train, but you are in fact standing still while train spotting.

Sorry NorthWestWind, I can’t give credit.

Come back when you’re a little …mmmmmhhhhh richer!

You want it? It’s yours my friend, as long as you have enough rubies.

I am all for mentioning his conviction in the 1st sentence, but the crowd saying it should go into the 2nd sentence make some good points.

Barely anyone gets to have “convicted felon” in their lead sentence. Firstly, it is poor style unless the person is only known because they did a crime, secondly, convicted felon can mean a lot of thing and should be specified. “Convicted of falsifying business records” is just so much more specific, and can later be added with “and election interference”.

In any case, while the discussion is ongoing it has been included in a 2nd sentence, and the editors supporting to move it to first sentence seem to be the majority. If only more of them would read the whole discussion, instead of just saying “Support due to being established fact”.

That physician is a bit out of his field of expertise, isn’t he?

New dentally enforced diet.