60% acceptance rate baseline? Doubt!
60% acceptance rate baseline? Doubt!
The post was in response to someone asking, “Do you have those stats?”
My post referenced probability multiple times.
That is the last of the clues I’m going to give. Perhaps try reading it again and looking up the words you are unsure of. Then instead of attempting to derail by arguing your imaginary discussion, consider that what was posted is exactly what was meant, no more, no less. You’ll eventually figure it out.
Nothing is off limits. I simply refuse to play your game of pretending I said something you wish to be angry about.
No, you did not. You wrote in response to what you pretended I posted. You again are only bogged by your choice to pretend I posted something very different than I posted.
I’d happily discussed what I posted. I have no interest in discussing your imaginary post which you chose to address rather than my post. I also have no interest in discussing anything with someone that wishes to pretend I posted anything other than I did.
Please show where I stated anything of the desires of the bear. I’m hinging nothing on proximity. You are simply assuming things I did not state. I covered that it wasn’t a risk assessment. Only thing bogged down is so bogged with your assumptions.
None of which is relevant to my statement.
Very few people someone gets near enough to be grabbed by want to rape them. Nearly every bear someone gets near enough to be grabbed by wants to kill them. A large number of women feel it is better to be killed by a bear than live with their irrational fear that every man they get near shall rape them. The fear not being rational is irrelevant as the fear is based upon a more than likely chance, approx. 25% is reported, that at some point the fear was justified and not irrational. However those numbers are screwy as folks that get raped are more likely to get raped again.
I’d give percentage chances of each occurring, (the National Park Service estimates the odds of being attacked by a bear are about one in 2.1 million.), but the media seems to only report percentage of gender raped not chance of rape.
It isn’t the heat so much as the stench.
Guys, hey wait Guys! Should The Revolution be covered in Corpo logos??? Look, I think it is more than just an image thing…
Then you’d be wasting your Vote on a candidate with zero chance at election.
People who claim GIMP isn’t up to Photoshop inevitably reveal the only actual issue is that they learned photoshop first.
look how much deeper blade three cut with a single stroke! Are you sure you want to go with brand 4?
So I what you are saying that we should ban all DEI activity, ban a bunch of books, and regulate Women’s bodily autonomy? /s
At some point you have to see that you are posting Pootie’s ‘both sides’ bullshit.
It most likely isn’t socialism either. However it could have a communist economic system, it is just very likely to be massively corrupt.
Ignores that common folk can neither buy at spot nor sell at spot.
God loves those that help themselves.
Going to be a whole new world of monetization to satisfy the share holders.
And in the two prior posts, children, we can see the difference between trained and experienced.