ĝis la revido kaj dankon pro ĉiuj fiŝoj!

  • 120 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 14th, 2023
  • TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.ml•An AI Singer-Songwriter Just Debuted Her Original Song—And The Responses Are Just BrutalEnglish
    1·
    11 months ago

    If the autogenerated art becomes too close to copyrighted art, then you’ll have humans suing AI generators.

    George Harrison’s My Sweet Lord is very similar to He’s So Fine by the Chiffons. And that was an easy case. But some cases in requires deeper analysis, such as Lana Del Ray’s Get Free.

    In January 2018, singer Lana Del Rey claimed that Radiohead were suing her because of alleged similarities between their 1992 debut single Creep, and her song Get Free, from her 2017 album Lust for Life. The band’s publishers Warner/Chappell subsequently denied taking legal action, but did confirm requesting credit for “all writers” of Creep.

    The Guardian spoke to a professional composer to analyse the songs, who noted that the chords used are rare in pop music, and the melodies bear an uncanny resemblance, although in conclusion “imagined the similarities are unintentional”.

    https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20190605-nine-most-notorious-copyright-cases-in-music-history

    If AI is sampling, then how do you defend it being unintentional? While all Radiohead sought was credit on the writing (in this case), would humans (whose livelihood is being threatened) be so generous with an AI composition? And if the music industry is threatened by AI, they will lawyer up.

  • TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.ml•An AI Singer-Songwriter Just Debuted Her Original Song—And The Responses Are Just BrutalEnglish
    32·
    11 months ago

    The fact that AI can produce this is impressive as to where we have come with AI. But can this actually threaten human artists?

    In the United States, a federal judge ruled in 2023 that AI artwork cannot meet federal copyright standards because “Copyright law is ‘limited to the original intellectual conceptions of the author’.” With no author, there is no copyright.

    ~~https://www.makeuseof.com/copyright-rules-ai-art/~~ See u/Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 's article below.

    “The answer will depend on the circumstances, particularly how the AI tool operates and how it was used to create the final work,” the office said.

    Under current US law, that song is probably now in the public domain. If the law changes, that could mean that in the future, music charts potentially could be filled with AI songs. As it stands, this is most-likely a public domain music machine cranking out music that anyone can use royalty-free. It depends on the interpretation of the courts.

  • TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.ml•When you sort by all and see all the Star Trek memesEnglish
    251·
    1 year ago

    I have posted correct information like that on Reddit and have been downvoted for providing sourced information. That really discourages my participation. Why try?

    I have to brag on Lemmy.world.

    This place is friendlier, and a much better place to interact with others. Oh, there’s still a down-vote brigade, but it’s much smaller.

    Reddit may still have a huge user base, but it’s becoming facebook-esque; that is, people go to it because they know it, and nothing else. This place is so much better.