• 1 Post
  • 197 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 5th, 2024

help-circle



  • YES. AND THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF THOSE PEOPLE WOULD GET JOBS AND PAY TAXES AND GROW THE ECONOMY. THIS IS AN EXTREMELY WELL STUDIED AND UNDERSTOOD PHENOMENON.

    SO IS PEOPLE COMING IN AND FORCEFULLY TAKING OVER YOUR COUNTRY, THE BORDERS ARE ALREADY THERE FOR THAT. IT CAUSES BOTH, YOU CANT BURY YOUR HEAD IN THE SAND AND IGNORE THE REST LMFAO

    WHY DID YOU IGNORE THE MAIN POINT AND THE ONE DETRIMENTAL TO YOUR POINT……? THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS ALREADY THERE AND MUST STAY THERE TO PROTECT FROM ITHER GOVERNMENTS, ITS A TRIVIAL COST FROM THERE TO SUPPORT OTHER MEASURES, ITS CALLED FUCKING EFFICIENCY YOU KOOK.

    And no, they did try to save the boat in distress, they always do. You keep looking at this with biased glasses, if you can’t discuss this in good faith get fucking lost. Theres already enough trolls here.





  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldguess I'll die
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    There’s lots that do, and not everyone will be capable of contributing. What about a mother of two kids with autism? She can’t work, will spend all her time caring for her kids who will into ever be a burden on the system.

    Every system is abused, that’s why they have limitations.


  • I did, there’s lots of people explaining the same thing to you……

    https://lemmy.zip/comment/11051328

    It’s a very simple concept, using income as a limitation, is a free way to discriminate against anyone you want who would be a burden. And you get people like you, who justify it, so they get to continue to do it. You want less, raise it, want more, lower it. They picked a specific number for a reason……

    Look we explained it, and we didn’t even need to get your opinion, since it’s just plain wrong…. Shocker….

    If you have money, you’re not a burden… as we established back at comment 2… yet you continued to argue this same asinine point.


  • You provided an article, or do simple words confuse you thus?

    And what facts? More claims, let’s see these facts that have now claimed have been provided.

    Why can’t you answer simple questions? You want to claim the income limitations aren’t discrimination, yet you won’t explain how… what a shocker.

    If you do, we can easily explain how it isn’t, but clearly you have trouble accepting that your opinion can’t be wrong.


  • You weren’t kind enough to do anything… you were asked for two specific countries, and provided a very easily disproved link that never supported your original claim…. Probably everyone discussing this topic here has googled and read that before, every country has an income limitation. We’ve established how that discriminates against disabled.

    I’ve read far more articles about this, you seem to be one who hasn’t done their homework, and you hold this asinine idea it’s fine to discriminate one way and not another. Everyone always finds a ways to justify their behavior sexist, racists, xenophobia, conservatives like you that protect their hypocrisy on others.

    The onus is on you dude, you’ve made the claim, people have debunked it for you, you either support it more, or stop digging in about the same dead point. All it’s doing is showing your hypocrisy as we’ve established comments ago.

    I’ll give you an easy one. How is income limitation not discrimination, please. This should be easy for you to answer, and should show us why you are being a piece of work. You went and made another claim you need to support now, let’s go, you fucked up dude.


  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldguess I'll die
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    You’ve also yet to answer the question about which two countries you specifically have claimed are better than others. Until you provide that, no one here should take anything you have claimed in good faith. Every place discriminates on disability in some way, you just got educated on how…… I’m sorry this is so hard for you to comprehend, income limitations are to prevent people from coming in and abusing the social nets.

    Can you provide a country without one so it can maybe align with your claims…? Or just answer the original question of which 2, they can be ripped apart and this entire thing is done and over.

    Either you’re right or not, you can only provide the means to prove that. Let’s go dude.


  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldguess I'll die
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Immigration requirements that aren’t about whether you have disabilities aren’t about whether you have disabilities.

    What’s that from? And how does it support your point?

    They absolutely are, they are discriminating people who would be a burden on their social nets, the fact that you’re trying to say they are two different things speaks volumes about your conservative character.

    You’re justifying discrimination people for one thing, while decrying another. Not a shocker that you’re a hypocrite, and are still digging that same hole while not explaining how it’s different. Just saying it’s not doesn’t prove anything lol.

    I also didn’t need to go past the first, since all the others have income limitations too…


  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldguess I'll die
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Why? Because it shows how stupid it is to argue disability restrictions are weird while claiming income isn’t….?

    Yeah people usually say that when they realize they’ve put their foot in their mouth, because that’s what you’re saying should happen if disability restrictions are “weird”.

    So are income restrictions okay? While others aren’t? Can you say it aloud that you are a hypocrite, you’ve basically said it in the comments, mind as well spell it out dude.

    What’s been debunked?


  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldguess I'll die
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Huh, it’s almost like these restrictions are for ones that can’t work and provide excessive support to those who can’t work. Like autism for example, that takes the caregiver out of being a productive citizen too.

    And an income limitation is exactly that, discrimination…. If there wasn’t an income limitation, anyone from like Uganda can come in and take advantage. You’re the heartless conservative now for limiting them.

    See how you’ve made this arbitrary line yourself that’s acceptable…? Income limitation, disability limitation, why is one okay and not the other….? That’s hypocrisy you conservative….

    You call me weird and conservative, yet those are things you’ve now shown yourself since we found your line, funny how that works doesn’t it? You can’t even see how simple and easy and discriminatory an income limitation is. It limits people with disabilities most since they have issues working and making money…. Fucking lol.


  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldguess I'll die
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    If you’re disabled and can’t work, you wouldn’t have an income. These places will give you money to support you if you can’t work.

    If you have income, you pay taxes when you spend that money, you’re paying for your burden………

    It’s so simple, yet you miss this? Come on. You should insult me some more, show how little you understand of the world……




  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldguess I'll die
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    I’m telling you I’ve done that, there is multiple people telling you they’ve never heard of this either.

    What’s wrong with naming two countries if you’re some of yourself…?

    Doesn’t even need to be the two you’ve been, why is this question so hard for you to answer if you believe in this so much?

    Even professionals make mistakes… why do you think that supports your claims? Answer the question and people can answer this for you.


  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldguess I'll die
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    What countries? You can’t prove your claim without anyone being able to verify it.

    Make excuses, but you need to provide the countries or your claims are quite frankly bullshit and not valid.

    We don’t need a life story lmfao, two countries. Thats it.

    And why are you saying I’m conservative? Because I’m calling out your bullshit claims? lol good one dude.