Huh, and wdym by that? What was the idea you tried to share that got you censored?
- 1 Post
- 119 Comments
tbf, Latinos were always on that list, and for a long while too… To prove this, they invented the term “America’s Backyard”.
What are “slightly right of left leaning” opinions that got you or someone you know censored?
and even if it was the same woman, it’s such an unimportant detail to get all pearl-clutchy over… Wait a second… Hold on… I’m getting new reports of something equally as suspicious… That mysterious guy that was and still is present in almost every meeting that Donald Trump was in turned out to be… some guy named “JD Vance” 😱
it’s vindicating to know that there are white people that can’t distinguish white people from white people…
oh woops, thanks for pointing that out. I guess I don’t have a great resource on Indonesia either other than The Jakarta Method, so I’ll just add that.
It’s either reductionist “Blame the government, not the people!” or holist “The world is at fault” with you people, you just can’t bring yourself to call out Western exploitation of the Global South.
There are at least 3 settler-colonies in the last panel that, in the past and as we speak, actively commit genocide, ethnic cleansing, destabilization of Global South states and other crimes, which were created and continuously enabled by the remaining featured countries, 4 of which were former empires that continue their legacy through neocolonialism. The rest, whom benefit greatly from said neocolonialism or are direct perpetrators themselves, are comprador states practicing systemic violence and repression on those that so much as sympathize with Dewesternization and anti-imperialism, states that harbor a shit ton of Nazis and states that are happy to murder immigrants and asylum seekers escaping the violence perpetrated by said states.
In order of apperance:
- The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine and the Creation of Israel (How We Got Here)
- The territories that were, at one time, colonized by the British Empire:
-
I don’t have a good comprehensive resource on Japan or Actually Part of China, someone else please help.
-
The Jakarta Method (correctly circles back to the US as the root cause)
-
NATO deserves the label ‘criminal organization’ within meaning of the Nuremberg judgment.
-
Combined longpost by я не из калининграда and davel respectively, detailing everything Ukraine
-
I’m skipping the UN on account of it being useless… Just take my word for it… or something.
-
EU countries were already listed, I don’t need to belabor the point.
EDIT: I confused Indonesia for Monaco, lmao.
what is the Arch distro equivalent in ML…
Asking for “postfacing every comment with a declaration of use” reasons
not even beating the allegations lol lmao
Yeah they do… As much as I’d want to cast my feelings about that aside (I have a lot), I don’t think I can muster a coherent thought about it without my blood boiling in the process…
From what little I know and from my understanding, it’s a goal that, once attained, would (hopefully) eventually change. The reality is that Palestinian resistance groups are not only facing against the Euroanglo-Zionazi entity, but also against compradors like the PA, against US MIC and NATO. My best guess here is that they’re keeping their goals grounded in terms of what is realistically achievable, relative to their material conditions…
Someone who knows better could probably tell you more than I could, though…
See that’s where the Liberal Zionism spin comes in, Liberal Zionism suggests that land claims to Palestine by Euroanglo-Zionazi are steadfast and not impeded, current and future settler-colonialists are welcomed while advocating for Western style “democracy”, “human rights”, “equal rights” and other Western lib horseshit for both Palestinians and Euroanglo-Zionazis.
Both in theory and practice, it’s a completely contradictory “ideology” that only serves to justify settler-colonialism where Palestinians obviously get the short end of the stick, if they get to get any at all.
Suggesting that progressive politics should be implemented to a settler-colonial entity that he already agrees should exist won’t change the fact that it is a settler-colonial entity occupying indigenous land rightfully belonging to Palestinians in full. No amount of “equal rights” will change that, only resistance by the occupied will. This isn’t the smart move we think it is, it’s just obvious Liberal Zionism wordvomit from Mamdani to appeal to his audience whom are, at the very least, Liberal Zionists.
Liberal Zionism is still Zionism and so is the two-state solution proposed by the West, no matter how you put it. This is still clear-as-day support for a Euroanglo-Zionazi state. Please don’t fall for prophetic entryism.
For Palestinians, to be subjected to almost a century of Lebensraum from Europeans and now recently others from other Western nations and then be told “Hey! Maybe we should live together in harmony with rainbows and sunshine to share!” is degrading beyond comprehension. Adding “with equal rights” means jack squat.
Not a single inch for Euroanglo-Zionazis. They know exactly where they come from.
This actually just means parliamentarism/electoralism is a sham, workarounds to it or entryism be damned.
nor supported Israel
‘Israel has the right to exist’ he said, then added ‘as a state with equal rights’
But that’s what BRICS is working on. Not going to say that I have any semblance of economic knowledge, but rapid dedollarization would mean countries would likely be pushed to agree to trade using local currency of respective countries.
Short term, it’ll be hard, uphill struggle. Long-term though? It’d be amazing for the Global South.
So far this trend is observable through China and Russia:
I think I might’ve read that other countries are warming up to do the same, but I don’t know.
So you’re a European settler now, makes sense, sorry for the confusion.
Exactly this. Liberalism having a stranglehold on academia is a major part of the reason why people end up with the conclusions from the top panel.