It’s the second time I see it on a programmer humor community. I get you want to advertise, but we already told you that this isn’t the place for that

Also, looking at the road, it doesn’t seems to be that bad. It ain’t central France bad

It’s an option!? I get severely motion sick in cars and I’d love those easier roads

I think I get it but explain nonetheless?

“Babe wake up. Ubuntu bookworm just dropped”

You’re just in the wrong place. You are looking at the documentation for installing on Ubuntu. But according to your logs I can infer that you are running Debian Bookworm.

Just go there: https://docs.docker.com/engine/install/debian/

Let’s just hope that they won’t use it as a justification to put ads in your browser, or go the brave route.

Bobby’s son

Oh I’m not talking that it can’t be trained well. That’s not my point.

Of course dogs can be trained to sniff drugs or find people, the gist of it is that they were trained for this behaviour, and might not understand it like we do.

A good exemple is a study that research on cancer sniffing dogs had problems with false positives.

proud Rust developer

Joke aside, everytime people gush over AI, I always have to remind them that AI is just a puppy that learnt how to maximise treats, and not actually understand shit. And this is a perfectly good example.

Oh yeah, there it’s a completely different story. But that’s mostly on OP to not provide context.

But if it was installed that way, it’s just MS being shitty again

Apart from the search engines being both shitty, here there’s nothing wrong

If you installed an extension to use bing search, what you want is to use bing search, not Google. So of course the extension has to say “don’t switch”

There’s also a good point on chrome’s side. There’s extensions that will switch your default search engine without your consent, so having the possibility to undo directly is nice.

Another way to see it, would be to switch chrome for firefox, Google search for duck duck go, and bing to qwant. Same story, but no shitty companies clouding judgements

Lost?

Good meme, bad reasoning. Things like that are why JavaScript is hated. While it looks the same, It should never, and in ANY case be IMPLICITLY turned into another type.

Oh, then you use and_then() or something similar.

There’s also the possibility to use the guard clauses patern and do let <...> = <...> else {}.

And finally, you can always split into another function.

It’s not straight rules. It depends on what makes it more readable for your case.

Use a match? Unless it’s for guard clauses, a match is fine enough

It’s a lot less readable imo. As well than a cargo fmt later and it’s gone (unless there’s a nightly setting for it)

Those async blocks exist when doing async in traits.

And I never said I respected the 4 level of indentations. That’s exactly the point of those rules. Keep it lowly indented but still readable

While I totally agree with that philosophy, it heavily depends on the language.

For Rust, my philosophy is more like this:

• Impl + fn body don’t count, as well as async blocks if they span the whole function
• do not nest more than one if statement. You probably better using guard clauses or matches
• do not put loops into an if statement.
• do not nest loops unless clearly shown to be (X, Y) indexing
• method chaining is free
• do not nest closures, unless the nested closure doesn’t have a {} block
• do not use mod unless it’s test for the current module. No I don’t want to Star Wars scroll your 1000 line file. Split it.

?

To be fair, a moron got full control of aperture so…