Seems to just be hosting issues https://www.reddit.com/r/Funkwhale/comments/1dlrsqn/funkwhaleaudio_down/
Seems to just be hosting issues https://www.reddit.com/r/Funkwhale/comments/1dlrsqn/funkwhaleaudio_down/
Funkwhale?
Frankly, I doubt he said anything worth listening to.
Do you think it’s deliberate how similar that name is to “enteral”?
The year of the ReactOS desktop?
On a serious note, I suspect the IOT version doesn’t have this requirement.
Coroner is mostly a legal and administrative position I think, medical examiners are the ones who actually oversee autopsies.
Raspberry pi is basically a marketing exercise for broadcom that got out of hand, so it doesn’t surprise me they’re doing this, unfortunately.
“Wedge shaped”? as in at an angle, or tapered?
If you want tapered then openSCAD has scaled extrusion or hulls. I think Fusion has similar tools.
The way I do this in TinkerCad is that I build the hollow first
Open SCAD calls that “difference”, I think fusion calls it a cut.
If you’re working in fusion you usually want to start with a 2d sketch and extrude it. You would make each holder as a component and then attach them later.
How is he controversial? the only negative thing I’ve seen about FUTO is the proprietary license grayjay is under.
the large ecosystem of commercial crap which has tainted by association the open source core of it
Isn’t the main shop plugin (woocommerce) heavily infested with that though?
Did this get federated into !lemmy@lemmy.ml from mastodon just because of the @lemmy tag?
That’s pretty cool.
It’s a hookup app, I think it’s optional (I don’t use it myself), but most people are going to want to know that.
Lemmy default UI is worst. It doesn’t even show the link. You have to click it’s title to see the video but it’s visually not a link.
If you click the thumbnail (or the arrow where the thumbnail normally is) it in-lines the video. So it works, it’s just not the most intuitive behaviour.
but set them to pull such numbers in for each post/comment mirrored from another instance.
I think the asynchronous way lemmy handles creating a comment/post and then sending it would make this difficult.
If you’re proposing overhauling the whole architecture of lemmy to use consistent UUID-based IDs for comments, posts, etc. across all instances, that could probably work but there are some edge cases especially with malicious actors, and it would be a huge undertaking.
That was what I was suggesting yeah, version 3-5 look like it could work, you could use the originating server as the name-space, and a local server generated ID for the name. As long as they only use information sent elsewhere the hashes should be reproducible, so you can check that a server is only using it’s own name to send new comments/posts, which should protect against the obvious attacks.
The more I think about it I’m not sure you would even need to use an official UUID system actually, just make something like <originating server>-<id from origin server> as the unique ID?
I agree it would be a big change to make though, especially dealing with all the existing posts.
the tl;dr is: he asked nicely for the source code and they gave it to him?
It’s a shame they don’t embrace federation and open source more, the drama it would create would be fun at least.
Usually if a community doesn’t load the first time, I just refresh the page and it loads.
OpenNIC is specifically designed to be censorship resistant.
Flux would be my guess