Pyro

Pretty sure that you get the benefit of the doubt if you had a feasible reason for adding/changing something about your food.

For example, you could add a laxative to your food/drink and be totally in the clear as long as you labelled your container with your name and maintain that you’ve been constipated. It’s a totally valid reason, plus it was labelled with your name so there’s no reason for anyone else to be consuming it.

I used to use that for ages, but the constant ads made me uninstall it

I think they were more likely referring to how when the public eye is on something many companies will start churning out low-effort products to capitalise on the interest. The market would be flooded with cheap and inferior products in that niche, potentially threatening the smaller business that actually cared about making quality products for those hobbyists. I know this won’t apply to every hobby, but there are definitely a number of them that will.

Craving carbs? Nah, you just need nitrogen. Just breathe some air, bro.

What even is that chart?

Her family tree must be a Penrose triangle

I’m a zoomer and I also have no fucking idea what this is

Gotta back up that claim my dude. Not everyone knows what everyone else has done.

I’m in the UK and it doesn’t work for me either, even after changing my question 4 or 5 times. It’s probably region-locked.

She was basically the first internet doxx.

This isn’t doxxing, this is just the internet spreading lies.

Doxxing is publishing personal/private information about someone online, which didn’t happen in this story.

Probably off-by-one errors

This is who all the people who pronounce “gif” as “jif” worship

implying that any developer actually reads warnings

I still remember getting that in Wordle. I think I stopped playing after that.

I reverberate.

I want to like Forgejo but the name is really terrible.

Is it “forj-joe”? Nah, that double-J sound is way too awkward.
Do you then merge the J sounds to make “forjo”? If so, why not just call it that?
Is it maybe “for-geh-joe”? That seems the most likely to me, but then that ignores the “build < forge” marketing on their website.

I know it’s pretty inconsequential, but it feels weird using a tool that you don’t even know how to pronounce the name of.

Seems like a “haha JS bad” kind of joke, but OP seems to forget that Python is also in a similar boat.

You at least have to know that it’s a meme format. Otherwise it just looks like someone complaining about async with a bad crop.

Interestingly, this JXL loads in Boost, but the one in the post doesn’t. Perhaps it’s because it’s inside a comment?

I would say finding that the bug is in a library is worse than finding it in your own code.

If it’s your own code, you just fix it.

If it’s in a library you then have to go and search for issues. If there isn’t one, you then go and spend time making one and potentially preparing a minimum reproducible example. Or if you don’t do that (or it’s just unmaintained) then you have to consider downgrading to a version that doesn’t have the bug and potentially losing functionality, or even switching to another library entirely and consequently rewriting all your code that used the old one to work with the new one.

Yeah, I’d take my own bugs over library bugs any day.

Many laptops are made with the US ANSI layout and other layouts like UK ISO are either shoehorned in at the final design stage or relegated to shuffling symbols around and requiring both Fn+Shift to type a character that used to have its own damn key. I’m not salty.