I love that Deadpool has replaced Ryan Reynolds because that’s basically who he is in public, all to manage his crippling anxiety.

At this point, Ubisoft and Bethesda games can be thrown in too.

It’s the light in the bathroom coming through a blind. I’m not sure why there’s a window with a blind looking into the bathroom but I’m glad I’m the only one in this room.

It’s one of those all inclusive resorts in Turkey. You are correct that it’s the bathroom. I’m not sure why there’s a window looking into it. The blind is outside so if someone went into the bathroom, I could pull up the blind. It’s very strange.

I didn’t have to but I wanted to. I didn’t want to sleep in complete darkness and thought the light was soft enough.

Nope, no long exposure. It’s actually a tad darker than it is in the picture.

I’ll definitely post this there too!

The most comprehensive Installation Guide is the one on ArchWiki bar none. I used the ArchWiki well before I started using Arch Linux, it’s just that good.

He’s hooked up to a polygraph machine which tests for truthfulness (with debatable accuracy). When asked if he spent their monthly budget on it, he says “yes” and his friend behind gives a thumbs up to indicate he’s telling the truth.

Not something I was aware of. Most people I talk to haven’t heard of them.

Sleep Token.

Not a single song I haven’t enjoyed. All I need now are their vinyls and a turntable.

Worship!

I assume they’re using waybar but essentially, it’s a transparent taskbar.

Can’t expect them to be fair to ethnic minorities when they’re too busy warmongering in Papua New Guinea.

That looks amazing. Probably the nicest looking Calendar interface I’ve seen and this is the first time I’m seeing a notification panel on Sway! What are you using for these?

But that would upset Pacman and you don’t want to upset Pacman, do you?

Have you tried SwayWM? If so, what differentiates Paper from Sway?

I’m asking mainly as a Sway user curious about other options (not because I dislike it, it works pretty well for me and I like the automation aspect).

How it goes about constructing sentences doesn’t mean the phrases it reproduces aren’t plagiarism. Plagiarism doesn’t care about probability of occurrence, it looks at how much one work closely resembles another and the more similar they are, the more likely it is to be plagiarised.

You can only escape plagiarism by proving that you didn’t copy intentionally or you cite your sources.

GPT has no defence because it has to learn from the sources in order to learn the probabilities of the phrases being constructed together. It also doesn’t cite its sources so in my eyes, if found to be plagiarising then it has no defence.

The reason GPT is different from those examples (not all of them but I’m not going into that), is that the malicious action is on the part of the user. With GPT, it gives you an output that it has plagiarised. The user can take that output and then submit it as their own which is further plagiarism but that doesn’t absolve GPT. The problem is that GPT doesn’t cite its own sources which would be very helpful in understanding the information it’s getting and with fact-checking it.

There’s a bit more nuance to your example. The company is liable for building a tool that allows plagiarism to happen. That’s not down to how people are using it, that’s just what the tool does.

I’m not sure what you mean by this. Information has always been free if you look hard enough. With the advent of the internet, you’re able to connect with people who possess this information and you’re likely to find it for free on YouTube or other websites.

Copyright exists to protect against plagiarism or theft (in an ideal world). I understand the frustration that comes with archaic laws and that updates to laws move at a glacier’s pace, however, the death of copyright harms more people than you’re expecting.

Piracy has existed as long as the internet has. Companies have been complaining ceaselessly about lost profits but once LLMs came along, they’re fine with piracy if it’s been masked behind a glorified search algorithm. They’re fine with cutting jobs and replacing them with an LLM that produces less quality output at significantly cheaper rates.

I get that part but I think what gets taken more seriously is how 'human" the responses seem which is a testament to how good the LLM model is. But that’s set dressing when GPT has been known to give incorrect, outdated or contradictory answers. Not always but unless you know what kind of answer to expect, you have to verify what it’s telling you which means you’ll be spending half the time fact-checking the LLM.