The stock market is made up, but not ruled, by numbers. Engineers are often overestimating themselves, specially in politics. Being good in the one thing doesn’t mean being good at all other things.

To save time, yes. To save on your skill, no.

Or in other words: only those, who are already masters, should use it.

My experience was that phones lasted two to three days back in the day. Before "smart"phones it would be easily a whole week.

Everything has pros and cons. Try OLED in the sun. To me refresh rates and numb coloring are irrelevant to what I need to do on a daily basis. Most of my work on the phone is speech and reading/texting anyways.

Did it improve? Seems not. An e-ink display would improve it.

The 4a was the last light one. When I tested the newer Pixels every of the a models was much heavier. I can’t get around it, why would engineers think it’s a good idea to make a successor heavier and not lighter?

You noob !!!

I see, thanks for the input. So then fuck Admiral Patrick and his other pseudonyms!

I do not understand why everyone is using the name of the codebase “tesseract” - which is in conflict with the absolutely wonderful concept of a tesseract - that is a four dimensional hyper cube. Why shame this beautiful word instead of shaming the name of the developer behind the fuckup? Save the word tesseract and shame the dev behind the frontend instead. Anybody care to explain their frivolity?