• 0 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: November 6th, 2023

help-circle
  • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.eetoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldReal
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Source: I work in/with electronics manufacturers

    Tl; dr - a mix of value engineering and consumer preference. You wanna buy a $3k TV, or a $700 TV? How rock solid does your automatic sprinkler really need to be, compared to a satellite radio in the Sahel?

    Per IPC industry standards, there’s three classes of electronic workmanship/quality control used:

    • Class 1: It works, just about. Shoddy soldering is okay as long as connectivity is maintained. Passing a QA test may be as simple as “it runs when powered”. This is where most consumer grade stuff lives: calculators, watches, flashlights, etc.
    • Class 2: Better built with generally more QA. Testing usually involves actually checking for function and different modes. Generally used only on commercial/civil government stuff like traffic lights, power controllers, heavy machinery - anywhere where reliability and longevity is worth paying more for.
    • Class 3: Complete process control and 100% coverage function (and almost always) burn-in/stress test cycles. Top quality and cost, typically only used for military, aerospace, or medical - where stuff failing means people die.





  • I’m not deriding the genius science-coup of appealing to royal ego, or pretending that there’s a desiccated thumb we’re using as a standard.

    They changed in 2019 from physical reference ‘blocks’ for the shared weakness as all the other systems that have a ‘master’ calibration unit - whether that’s the SI kilogram or a cubit, or the goddamn kings arm. If the ‘master’ calibration unit changes, that introduces imperceptible drift.

    This becomes even more important for actual science - say your scale manufacturer calibrates against the standard ‘master’ measure last week, but your prior lab scales are older. Or apply that across different countries even - they all calibrated against the ‘master’ standard, but minute changes between years or decades looses the authentic standard of X. Dust, temperature, damage, etc all can very slightly throw off the consistency










  • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.eetoMemes@lemmy.mlMaterialism
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    By rejecting materialism and embracing anti-materialism you are freed from the shackles of the physical constructs around us, able to shape and bend your environment- even from a long distance.

    The individual practice is relatively new, starting in the mid 1910s but it blossomed and has ardent support in multiple nations with different styles expressed. Russians lean towards simplicity and utilitarianism, the American practice trends avant-garde, while the Chinese largely iterate on existing foundations.

    Until we achieve a revolutionary advancement in science, anti-materialism is here to stay, and not just because of knee-jerk Luddite sentiment, but because of the unique effects it has on our world and others.




  • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.eetomemes@lemmy.worldI hate griefers
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s right there, as written by the ESRB lawyers:

    Experience may change with online play

    If you get tilted at a sweaty who knows the maps and meta, that’s your skill issue. Staying in the same lobby is you voluntarily agreeing for another round. Change lobby, get over it and do better, or go touch grass. Some of the biggest learning experiences in games are when I get my ass handed to me, and you watch the replay/killcam/demo file.

    Smurfing is just pathetic bullying tho