I see! Thank you for clearing that up.

Isn’t there an issue with webp where it could potentially run arbitrary code?

Do you mean AI, just Generative models, or LLMs in particular? I’m pretty thoroughly convinced that AI is a general solution to automation, while generative models are only a partial but very powerful solution.

I think the larger issue is actually that displacement from the workforce causes hardship to those who have been displaced. If that were not the case, most people either wouldn’t care or would actively celebrate their jobs being lost to automation.

This article makes me think this is a tankie wiki, because literally everyone from that awful place is a tankie as far as I can tell.

As soon as Kurtzgesagt said John Green I knew what the video would be about. John Green has made TB awareness his mission for a couple of years now.

I love sleepy murderer.

I would like to kindly ask everyone not to claim her as a trans icon.

This face looks back at you.

Spiraling wind finger?

Is that from Naruto?

Humans are Space Orks.

I’m surprised! Good to know, ty.

Some years ago, Pussy Riot put out information on how to use Makeup to confound face detection algorithms.

On an unrelated note: This is probably going to be blocked in ML because I used the word “pussy”. I wonder why that instance has a problem with me mentioning that word. Could it be perhaps the name of a feminist anarchist group activity resisting domestic Russian oppression? No, I’m sure that’s a coincidence.

Edit: Ty to everyone who helped correct my misunderstanding. The feedback has been informative, but I’ll leave my comment as-is so people reading have context incase they also have misconceptions.

I absolutely misread your comment as “which anime?” and was under the assumption you thought it was a regular yaoi. 😂

Neon Genesis Evangelion.

But trust me, you aren’t.

That’s the nature of language.

Correct.

That is also NOT the definition

So your previous statement was that a specific (unstated) way of defining Good and Evil, while paired with our typical modern worldview implied that Good and Evil didn’t exist? I suppose you’re almost certainly correct if that’s the case, but I don’t find that to be a very interesting statement. The only other way I can interpret this is as a claim that there is exactly one definition of Good and Evil, and anyone who uses a different definition is wrong, but that strikes me as an utterly foolish position.

I wasn’t aware of Hume’s account of definition, but it strikes me as extremely straightforward.

Seriously?

The way you’ve argued thus far has made me believe you are likely young and ignorant. In this thread, you keep making statements that fail to address previous points. You replied to a statement about my position I made to a different user. I was talking about the role of genetics in psychology, and you brought up making predictions about behavior (which no one had mentioned) and then when I addressed your previous point hoping it might lead somewhere you started talking about empathy instead. How was I supposed to interpret that?

predicting

Empathy isn’t a behavior, it’s a basic cognitive function.

I have yet to see evidence of

Have you taken any psychology or neurology classes? I have. It’s not my field of specialty, but I got As in each where applicable. If you’re going to hold such a strong opinion on this, you should at least put in the effort to do some basic research, or better yet, get some education on the subject.

Alright, same question as before: why do you believe that?

You can, infact, use certain facts about someone’s genome to inform predictions about their behavior. If you mean to say that you can’t perfectly predict someone’s behavior, then of course you can’t; I don’t recall ever meeting someone who argued otherwise.