Excuse me the correct slang here would be to hit someone with that “hawk tuah”
Excuse me the correct slang here would be to hit someone with that “hawk tuah”
I really want to see the zygote approach worked out for electron. It’s working really well for android but with electron there are just too many different versions used by the different programs for that to make sense.
Chickpea <3
Get ratio’ed
This point advocates against the use of mod with content in a file unless it is used for a testing module. A common pattern is to have the unit tests for a module inside the main module file. Tests in rust are just specially tagged functions. To avoid compilation costs in non-test builds and false unused code warnings you can put all test related code in a submodule and tag that module with [cfg(test)]
. That way the module will only be included and compiled if the crate is being compiled to run tests.
The Star wars thing refers to scrolling long text files similar to the intro of the starwars movies where a long text is scrolled for the viewer.
mod name
declares that the module should be compiled and reachable as a submodule of the current module. This assumes that you have a file or directory of the name in the right place. This is what you should do.
You can also declare a module like this: mod name {...}
where you just put the content in the block. The two are functionally equivalent, from the compilers perspective.
Yes I agree and I think I expressed that in the first half of my comment.
That’s one part of the lesson here yes. I definitely needed a minute to figure out why this whole thing caused a negative emotion in me. And going through this process will hopefully help me do it quicker the next time over. But on the other hand a bit of empathy for humans behaving like humans wouldn’t hurt either. It’s no wonder men react to the topic like they do, identifying with the person in a scenario sharing your gender is simply how human brains work. It’s why representation of diversity is important, but the same effect obviously also works on men.
I think this is an important point on the interpretation of the question. For women it seems like “Be in the wild with the worst possible man or the worst possible bear” and then the bear seems to “win”. If you ask a guy he naturally kind of identifies with the man and the question becomes more a “be in the wild with you or with a bear”. And then choosing the bear seems like a judgement about them.
I think it’s related to scars from cutting yourself. You can get addicted to that. The joke being that the partner confuses the two types of scars
One example where that doesn’t seem to work is public infrastructure. There is just no way to make this profitable and simultaneously provide a service that actually meets the needs of the public in terms of availability and price.
There is one problem with this: what’s profitable and what’s beneficial for society do not necessarily align.
You’d rather entrust almost every aspect of your live to the benevolence of some people that do not have any oversight by the populous that they have power over by the means of controlling the capital?
I’d imagine it works the same as it does under capitalism but instead of pitching to a set of private investors the investment decisions are made… Democratically?
Honestly Beer should appear just as the background
Sleeping in your car in public is not allowed in Germany either
Internet protocols are better in so many ways
This is VERY debatable because statements that broad are almost always false. There is no need to have a cellular->IP->cellular bridge for 1:1 communication involving more servers, more service providers. If anyone wanted to they could implement at least the 1:1 signal protocol and probably even the messaging layer security protocol on top of SMS to get e2ee group communications.
Nobody wants to because cell providers sell SMS for horrendous prices compared to internet access.
I mean to be honest to only reason to use messengers is just costs, I wish SMS where as cheap as internet flatrates… But that might very well be a regional issue too
You just have a chain of unprovable assumptions there.
Kid’s use slang -> they must have picked it up on the internet -> many people are illiterate -> the parents of these specific kids are not raising them right