• 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 6th, 2023

help-circle
  • Nuclear is the worst possible option to fill said gaps. Nuclear reactor need to run at a mostly stable output permanently, they are slow to react to changes and can’t be switched on or off at will.

    You could use them to generate a stable base power level, but that’s the opposite of what we need. It wouldn’t change anything regarding the need of energy storage.

    The best option currently as a gap filler is gas cause it can be turned on or off in minutes when needed.

    Not keeping up with demand is a self-made problem. Multiple EU countries already have multiple days a year where they use 100% renewables.



  • Jako301@feddit.detoMemes@lemmy.mlEA gonna EA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s the implementation that will probably annoy me the most. If the ingame radio station in GTA tried to sell me coke or Pepsi I probably wouldn’t even notice since it fits in with the world. But knowing EA they will probably put them in as additional loading screen that you can’t skip.


  • Jako301@feddit.detoMemes@lemmy.mlEA gonna EA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    I agree with the first part (not that it should mean they can just extract more money out of us), but the second part is something I simply don’t believe.

    Don’t get me wrong, I know budgets have increased, but the dev cost definitely didn’t by remotely the same amount. Devs wages are pretty stagnant since the initial silicon Valley boom and new tools at our disposal have made it a lot easier to create games, be it for indi devs or the corporate giants. Sure, graphics got fancier, but so did the readily aviable stock assets. High end work stations cost maybe a bit more, but they are a drop in the bucket in the 100+ million budgets of today.

    What has increased on the other hand is the amount of executives/managers and their wages. In addition to that marketing has gone up a lot, probably over half of most budgets go there. The growing corporate overhead with its archaic structures also eats up a lot.

    If we go purely by dev cost, prices should go down since the overall profit would increase with the greater amount of players. Everything else is corporate overlords throwing shitloads of money at a mediocre game to make it seem worth something.


  • Jako301@feddit.detoMemes@lemmy.mlsIGmA BeHaiovouR
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because Bethesda doesn’t provide the legacy versions on steam, unlike other mod focused games, afaik. Once you’ve updated your game, you are stuck with whatever version you have.

    Sure, you can always download the right version from somewhere else, but I wouldn’t count piracy + the risks coming with it as a viable excuse for their fuckup.









  • Emulators are legal

    In general yes, but Yuzu itself probably never was legal in the first place.

    At least in the EU and US there are anti-circumvention laws that make circumventing anti-piracy/copy-protection measures illegal in itself even if its done on games you own. Since Yuzu used the prod.keys to decrypt the games, it most likely already broke these laws.


  • While I despise apple for a lot of reasons, I have to somewhat defend them here. MacOS is a lot more efficient with its tailor made hardware and 8GB of RAM in a MacBook is closer to 16GB in a normal laptop. Their hardware prices are around the industry standard if you look at the windows/android equivalent of their advertised specs.

    Of course the flagship products are completely overpriced, but that’s the case for pretty much all manufacturers and not really what should be looked at for comparisons.



  • Exactly, no one knows, but here we are on the 7th article saying Google is slowing down Firefox on purpose. That’s the least likely option by far. That would get them into multiple anti consumer and anti monopoly lawsuits while probably breaching their contract with FF at the same time. Alphabets board of advisors isn’t run by Elon musk, they know pretty much what they can get away with and wouldn’t be stupid enough to try something this big while they are already beeing monitored by the EU.


  • It’s a standard timeout function without any context. Most likely thing is that it tries to load an ad and if that doesn’t work in these 5 seconds, then the anti adblock popup is displayed. If you don’t use an adblock, the site loads instantly cause the ad is detected. If you use ublock, you see neither the ad nor the popup, so everything that’s left is a 5 seconds timeout.

    While it definitely is shady coding, it’s an anti adblock “feature” caused by incompetent design and not an anti Firefox thing.


  • Jako301@feddit.detoMildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldFacepalm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Non-personalized ads pay a fraction of the money targeted ads can get you.

    Non intrusive ads are pretty much just amal banner ads on the side, they pay near to nothing.

    Youtube barely makes any money as is, if you introduce even one of these changes they are far into the red again.

    Now if we also remove any tracking, then Google has no reason at all to keep it going and will just shut it down.

    I despise Google too, I avoid them like the plague, my phone is deggogled and all my apps come from third party storefronts. But YouTube simply is not a profitable business without personalised ads and tracking.