Do you really want to work for a company that allows their HR department to abuse AI as a tool?
Do you really want to work for a company that allows their HR department to abuse AI as a tool?
To be even more pedantic, isn’t it the impulse?
Intergenerational wealth is a major determinant for an individual’s wealth.
Do you want to know more?
https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/akillewald/files/generations_of_advantage.pdf
Page 23 is the conclusion, start there.
How do I upload menu details for OSM? I couldn’t figure it out.
Maybe the test says less about the tester, and more about the testee.
This is why I never look up supporting evidence. I rather just stay in my ignorance. /s
It’s rage bait, that’s why it’s spreading. Do your part, downvote and move on.
I would argue that the saying “Nothing a man should risk once you have children.” is doing exactly as you are describing.
How much would he make using ropes. I’m sure it’d be pretty damn close.
I’m confident he would be just another climber and wouldn’t be world famous and wouldn’t be able to demand such high payment. He makes fat stacks because he is extraordinary, not because he’s doing what everyone else is doing.
Alex Honnold (born August 17, 1985) is an American rock climber best known for his free solo ascents of big walls. Honnold rose to worldwide fame in June 2017 when he became the first person to free solo a route on El Capitan in Yosemite National Park (via the 2,900-foot route Freerider at 5.13a, the first-ever at that grade),
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Honnold
Fortune favours the bold.
What you mentioned are risks that have a payoff; … This doesn’t really. Maybe he makes slightly more money
Is $3 million net worth at 36 years old “slightly more money” these days? I’m further behind than I thought.
Nothing a man should risk once you have children.
There is risk in everything. Being an employee and relying on a business to provide you with money is risky, yet billions of men take that risk across their working lives.
If a man cannot risk anything to have a family, then there will never be any man who qualifies.
In fact many men work high risk jobs because they pay the most.
Yeah, this sounds like a win. If we replace the word “snack” with “smokes” then it’s a definite win.
I’m envious that you get to watch it for the first time.
Surely this article can’t be serious?
What is this?! A healthy relationship based on trust and communication? I came here to laugh at dysfunction, get out of here. /s
Translation: “I can’t refute your core argument so I’ll attack the way it was delivered.”
Returning to the idea of rehabilitating these men, I leave you with a quote:
“You catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar.”
I’m going to hold you responsible for defending them from criticism they need to face.
These men already face the criticism, that is the driver pushing them further to become abusive and self-abusive.
What you are suggesting is cornering an animal, and then saying “Hey, we should corner it more because it’s acting aggressively.” and then acting surprised when it attacks you.
We need to offer these men a healthy way out which is culturally appropriate.
Meanwhile, Ernie Hudson at 78 years old.