• 0 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2023

help-circle




  • Icaria@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldAge range
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Nah, mate, you’re just deranged. You see any two people in public together and assume they’re screwing, then if someone points out to you that they’re probably just related you still think they’re screwing? Fuckin’ weird.



  • Icaria@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldAge range
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    when I see a 45 year old guy with an 18 year old

    And you just assume it must be an age-gap relationship and start getting icky feelings and start looking online for ways to justify your pearl-clutching and feelings of outrage, when on the balance of probabilities they’re just a father and daughter with a healthy affectionate relationship you never had growing up, and you just have unresolved emotional issues.

    Yeah… ngl, kinda hoped we’d left most of you people behind on reddit.


  • Icaria@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldAge range
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I think it’s time you calmed down

    rage

    feels

    if you calmed down

    free meditation resources

    you continue to defer to feels

    That’s the feels covered

    now tell me why you’d type the way you did it you weren’t blinded by rage

    Fuck me, you’re tedious and desperate. Oh noes, I swore again, I must be ‘raging’. Absolutely one-note, and about a decade by its best-by date as a troll, let alone a debate tactic. Even if you could get me stirred up, it wouldn’t be an impediment to my reasoning skills or articulation because I’m not a child.

    I’ve brought credible, relevant studies and stats

    …over something that was never a point of contention. You went google-fuing for no other reason than to look like you’ve got something to argue with me about.

    There’s no difference between looking upon something with suspicion and actively intervening? This is just stupid on the face of it - tantamount to “There’s no difference between investigating someone and executing them.”

    No, if we’re going with argument by analogy, what you’re doing is stirring up a witch hunt and then claiming no responsibility when people you’ve enabled drown a bunch of spinsters.

    You don’t look upon a bunch of strangers’ relationships with ‘suspicion’ if you have any fucking concept of pulling your fucking head in and minding your own business. You’re a busybody, a gossip, a meddler. If you want a predictor, try having a healthy relationship with anyone when you’ve got a bunch of twat neighbours looking through your windows and whispering behind your backs. You’re the same kind of arsehole who makes going out in public hell for a lot of mixed-race couples because they get smirks and weird comments about how it must be a ‘mail order bride’ scenario. Like you’re not fighting for some great moral victory here, you just suck.


  • Icaria@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldAge range
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I read this over a couple of times looking for your thesis statement… nope, there wasn’t a point hidden in there anywhere, just poorly-contextualised quoting of statistics, like how you gloss over the very poor success rates on dating apps/sites, and an opening strawman.

    Just a very overwrought u mad troll. Okay, cool, can’t believe I interrupted my movie for a ploy straight out of 2010.

    You also seem to be confusing looking upon something with suspicion and actively intervening - why?

    Because there isn’t a difference. The moment someone falls on the wrong side of a taboo, they’re considered fair game. You’re just doing the work of rationalising it.



  • Icaria@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldAge range
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think it’s reasonable to look at this sort of thing with suspicion

    I think it’s reasonable to mind your own fucking business. The judging and flimsy excuses to meddle are guaranteed to cause relationship issues for others.

    You act when there’s evidence of abuse, not ‘predictors’. This is fucking twitter/reddit moon-logic where every day 5000 supposed serial killers are identified based entirely upon whether they kicked a dog or left the toilet seat up.

    Think about the likely reasons someone would seek that kind of thing

    This is a stupid assumption in itself. Most people don’t have a wealth of relationship options to choose from. If you’re desperate enough to denigrate yourself using tinder, you’re desperate enough to cast as wide a net as possible and settle for anyone not actively smoking meth.






  • Icaria@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlchoose...
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Hardly just my experiences. Zero quality control when it came to content, the sub was often full of reposted random tweets from bit-part actors from the 90’s, often not even talking about ST, or trashy shit like playing fuck/marry/kill with the cast of DS9, but at a certain point it got turned into unpaid PR for CBS/Paramount, where you couldn’t make even light-hearted jokes about any currently broadcast show. Everything and anything would be struct down with some “be constructive” rule that translated to toxic positivity and users functioning as little more than advertisers for the shows, that sub was basically a test bed for the enshittification of reddit as an advertising platform, and trying to discuss it with the mods just got you a bunch of smarmy smartarsery in return. They’re pretty much every 90’s stereotype of a ST fan running a chatroom.

    If you looked at any of the other ST-related subs, you used to find no shortage of people with similar stories. I’m sure many of them were neckbeards in their own right who just raged against any and all new ST stuff, often with weird political bents, but given I’m not one of them and still got bullshit from them, I’m guessing a fair few of them had valid grievances too.


  • Icaria@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlchoose...
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Startrek.website seems to be run by the same people who ran r/startrek, some of the most ridiculous, petty, power-tripping stereotypes of neckbeard reddit mods you could find. Not that familiar with the other two, but lemmy.world seems to be run by reasonable people just trying to do their best.